Results 251 to 260 of about 5,691 (291)
The European Court of Human Rights and Transnational Judicial Dialogue
Vienna Online Journal on International Constitutional Law, 2015 Over the past decade, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) seems more and more inclined to use foreign sources of law, that is to say, law that does not originate in the Convention itself or in one of the Member States of the Council of Europe ...
Carla M Zoethout
exaly +2 more sources
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
Argumentation, 1991
A variety of theoretical positions are emerging to explain the judicial process from such perspectives as hermeneutics, semiotics, critical theory and argumentation/rhetoric. They ask such questions as these: What is the source of judicial authority? How do judges arrive at their decisions? By what logic are decisions to be tested?
openaire +1 more source
A variety of theoretical positions are emerging to explain the judicial process from such perspectives as hermeneutics, semiotics, critical theory and argumentation/rhetoric. They ask such questions as these: What is the source of judicial authority? How do judges arrive at their decisions? By what logic are decisions to be tested?
openaire +1 more source
Constitutional Dialogue and Judicial Supremacy
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2010This paper analyzes constitutional dialogue by comparing a constitutional system that (almost) entrenches judicial supremacy - the United States - with a constitutional system that seeks to reconcile a judicial and legislative role in constitutional interpretation - Canada. The argument has three parts.
openaire +1 more source
The Judicial-Policy-Dialogue Game
2021How do courts show the two faces of judicial power in the interaction with the political branches? In order to approach this question, I design the Judicial-Policy-Dialogue Game. The game simplifies the implicit and explicit interaction between the highest court and the governing majority to identify core mechanisms in the interplay between both actors.
openaire +1 more source
Judicial Dialogue about Judicial Independence in terms of Rule of Law Backsliding
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2023The latest CEU DI Working Paper by our Post-doctoral Fellow Barbara Grabowska-Moroz discusses the recent ruling of the Court of Justice of the EU in the Getin Noble Bank case (C-132/20) in which the Court decided to discuss judicial independence with the Polish "judge" appointed by the captured council for the judiciary.Both aspects of the Getin Noble ...
openaire +2 more sources
The Limits of Global Judicial Dialogue
2016The notion that 'global judicial dialogue' is contributing to the globalization of constitutional law has attracted considerable scholarly attention. Numerous scholars have characterized the citation of foreign law by constitutional courts as a form of 'dialogue' that both reflects and fosters the emergence of a common global enterprise of ...
Law, DS, Chang, WC
openaire +1 more source
Judicial Dialogue after the Genocide in Rwanda
International Community Law Review, 2019Abstract In this study, the author describes the dialogue between the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda and the Gacaca courts after one of the bloodiest conflicts in the contemporary history of Africa – the 1994 genocide in Rwanda. The purpose of this work is to show how international and internal cooperation can influence the solving of armed
openaire +1 more source
Constitutional Dialogue and the Justification of Judicial Review
Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 2003The lively debate over the constitutional foundations of judicial review has been marred by a formalism which obscures its point and value. Abstracted from genuine issues of substance, the rival positions offer inadequate accounts of the legitimacy of judicial review; constitutional theory must regain its connection with questions of political ...
openaire +1 more source
Regional Judicial Cooperation and Dialogue
Abstract This chapter explores intra-Asian judicial dialogues that take place through personal encounters or electronic means. It suggests that instances of such judicial cooperation can vary in design along four dimensions: bilateral-multilateral, generalist-specialist, ad hoc-systematic, and formal-informal; and it illustrates the ...openaire +1 more source