Results 61 to 70 of about 13,060 (299)
Efficacy of Inebilizumab in N‐MOmentum Trial Participants With or Without Prior Immunosuppressants
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology, EarlyView.ABSTRACT This post hoc analysis examined the impact of prior immunosuppressants on the long‐term efficacy and safety of inebilizumab, a cluster of differentiation 19+ B‐cell–depleting monoclonal antibody, in participants with aquaporin‐4–seropositive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder from the N‐MOmentum trial (NTC02200770).
Bruce A. C. Cree +9 more
wiley +1 more source
Studia Historica: Historia Moderna, 2017 The regulations of 1783, 1788 and 1799 started the institutionalisation of the judicial career in the Spanish Monarchy. The analysis of these rules permit observing the changes and the limitations of the judicial officials and judges’ ethics during the ...
Manuel Amador GONZÁLEZ FUERTES
doaj +1 more source
Judicial Ethics Symposium report
, 2003 Title from PDF caption, p. 1 (viewed Sept.
Ohio Judicial Conference. Judicial Ethics Committee.
core
Screening Routine Clinical Notes for Epilepsy Surgery Candidates Using Large Language Models
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology, EarlyView.ABSTRACT Objective Epilepsy surgery is severely underutilized despite proven efficacy, with substantial under‐referral of eligible patients in routine clinical practice. This study evaluated the potential role of large language models (LLMs) as decision‐support tools for screening unstructured clinical notes to identify epilepsy surgery candidates and ...
Uriel Fennig +9 more
wiley +1 more source
Die etiek van regstellende aksie
Acta Theologica, 2006 This article addresses the ethics of affirmative action in South Africa from a Christian ethical perspective. It firstly evaluates the Biblical teachings of redistributive justice and the implications of these teachings for a modern ethical view of ...
J. M. Vorster
doaj +1 more source
Jurisprudence and Judicial Ethics
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2007 The fundamental value in judicial ethics is impartiality. This means that a judge is duty-bound to decide cases on their merits, be open to persuasion, and not influenced by improper considerations. The paradigm case of unethical behavior by a judge is taking a bribe to decide a case in favor of one of the parties.
openaire +2 more sources
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology, EarlyView.ABSTRACT Objective Digital technologies hold promise for transforming healthcare by enhancing personalized treatments and offer valuable opportunities to improve patient care. Here, we evaluated several novel, self‐administered, home‐based, digital endpoints for their association with corresponding conventional standard clinical measures (primary) in ...
Arne Mueller +14 more
wiley +1 more source
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology, EarlyView.ABSTRACT Objective To clarify the clinical relevance of dopamine transporter single‐photon emission computed tomography (DAT‐SPECT) abnormalities in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), with a prespecified focus on sex‐stratified associations with disease progression and short‐term prognosis.
Tomoya Kawazoe +7 more
wiley +1 more source
, 2023 This Article seeks to untangle a cluster of controversies and conundrums at the epicenter of the judiciary’s role in American government, where a judge’s identity as a person and role as a judge intersect. Part I synthesizes the traditional ethics schema,
Geyh, Charles Gardner
core +2 more sources
Judge Serving as a Member of a Hospital's Ethics Committee
, 2003 Issue: May a judge, newly appointed to the county court, continue to serve on a hospital's ethics committee, when the county in which the hospital resides, and the county for which the judge serves, are in the same judicial circuit? Answer: No.
core