Results 241 to 250 of about 343,726 (278)

Evaluating judicial program effectiveness

New Directions for Student Services, 1987
AbstractThis chapter discusses the need for evaluation, recommends a model, suggests a planning cycle, and identifies constituents for evaluation. It also outlines steps in personnel and program evaluation and methods for implementing evaluation results.
Narbeth R. Emmanuel, Keith M. Miser
openaire   +1 more source

Evaluation in judicial affairs

New Directions for Student Services, 1996
Abstract„As we face our shared future, we must be able to articulate clearly what we do and why it takes so many of us to do it. Careful evaluation of programs, in concert with a commitment to modify or abandon ones that no longer meet student or institutional goals, is essential”︁ (Barr, 1993, p. 524).
openaire   +1 more source

Evaluating Current Judicial Oversight

2012
This chapter examines current judicial oversight of contract law, and more specifically the extent to which boilerplate is regulated as contract. It first considers the three categories of the normal, traditional oversight doctrines for contracts: coercion or duress; fraud, deception, or misrepresentation; and invalid contract formation.
openaire   +2 more sources

The Limits of Judicial Accountability; the Role of Judicial Performance Evaluation

Legal Ethics, 2003
(2003). The Limits of Judicial Accountability; the Role of Judicial Performance Evaluation. Legal Ethics: Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 55-72.
openaire   +1 more source

Evaluation of Dying Declaration – Recent Judicial Perspectives

Indian Internet Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, 2016
The principle on which dying declarations are admitted in evidence is indicated in the legal maxim - nemo moriturus praesumitur mentire - a man will not meet his maker with a lie in his mouth. These are declarations made in extremity when the party is at the point of death and when every hope of this world is gone, when every motive to falsehood is ...
Dipa Dube, Mukesh Yadav
openaire   +1 more source

Judicial Dispute Resolution: Program Setup and Evaluation in Edmonton

Family Court Review, 2004
Judicial Dispute Resolution or JDR is a pre‐trial settlement process involving judges as settlement facilitators. In October 2000 the Family and Youth Court in Edmonton, Alberta launched a yearlong JDR pilot project to determine whether JDR would help in resolving family and child welfare matters before the court.
openaire   +1 more source

Evaluating Judicial Performance for Caseload Allocation

2019
This article examines the principles and processes governing the allocation of work to judicial officers in Australian courts. It investigates the extent to which implicit evaluation of judicial performance occurs as part of the workload allocation process.
openaire   +1 more source