Judicial Performance and Experiences of Judicial Work: Findings from Socio-legal Research
Judicial performance evaluation processes and programs tend to imply an abstract, normative model of the proper judge. The focus is on the individual judicial officer, identifying how judges ought to perform their judicial work and assessing any ...
Sharyn Roach Anleu, Kathy Mack
doaj +2 more sources
Furthering Judicial Education : Proceedings of the Conference of Judicial Schools in Latin America
The conference meeting was organized by the Supreme Court of Justice of Guatemala, in partnership with the World Bank, where judicial school directors, judges, practitioners, law students, and officials from
Malik, Waleed Haider +1 more
core +1 more source
ABSTRACT Background SOX1 antibody‐positive paraneoplastic neurological syndromes (PNS) exhibit significant population‐specific clinical heterogeneity. While Western cohorts predominantly manifest Lambert‐Eaton myasthenic syndrome (65%–80%), comprehensive clinical characterization and treatment response data in Asian populations remain critically ...
Jin‐Long Ye +11 more
wiley +1 more source
Clustering Algorithm Reveals Dopamine‐Motor Mismatch in Cognitively Preserved Parkinson's Disease
ABSTRACT Objective To explore the relationship between dopaminergic denervation and motor impairment in two de novo Parkinson's disease (PD) cohorts. Methods n = 249 PD patients from Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) and n = 84 from an external clinical cohort.
Rachele Malito +14 more
wiley +1 more source
EVIDENCE IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE: THE IMPORTANCE OF THE EVIDENCE EVALUATION AND ITS CONTROL IN APPEAL
This article discusses important premises related to criminal evidence, aiming to define its function and models for its evaluation in contemporary procedural dogmatics. The problems that guide the development of this research are: 1) what is the role of
Vinicius Gomes de Vasconcellos
doaj +1 more source
The myth of ‘Judicial customary law’: Reflections from Anglophone Cameroon
This paper unravels the origins of the concept of ‘judicial customary law’, a variant of customary law, acknowledged and recognised in some common law jurisdictions of sub-Saharan Africa.
Emmanuel M. Kiye
doaj +1 more source
Impact of Asymptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage on Outcome After Endovascular Stroke Treatment
ABSTRACT Background Endovascular treatment (EVT) achieves high rates of recanalization in acute large‐vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke, but functional recovery remains heterogeneous. While symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) has been well studied, the prognostic impact of asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (aICH) after EVT is less certain ...
Shihai Yang +22 more
wiley +1 more source
From Evaluation to Improvement: A Chief Justice’s Perspective
At the Supreme Court of Victoria, Australia, concepts of judicial performance and evaluation are relatively new. Responding to modern expectations for increased judicial accountability for their performance, Victorian judges have engaged a number of ...
Marilyn Warren
doaj +2 more sources
Who works more, and who works smarter?: Comparing Judicial Performance in Europe [PDF]
This paper (1) analyzes the existing theoretical framework for understanding the relationship between the judicial performance and judicial efficiency, (2) compares the judicial performances in Serbia, Croatia, Slovenia, France, Austria, and Norway for ...
Spaić Bojan, Đorđević Mila
doaj +1 more source
Evaluation of Post -Traumatic Mental Disorders from Medicolegal Perspective
We presented five cases who were sent referred to our department for a judicial report. We discussed the effect of post-traumatic psychiatric diseases on the results of the report and we aimed to emphasize the importance of psychiatric examination in the
Mehmet Sunay Yavuz +4 more
doaj +1 more source

