Results 1 to 10 of about 3,469 (144)

Evaluating Judicial Performance: Editors’ Introduction

open access: greenOñati Socio-Legal Series, 2014
The articles in this issue tackle the conceptual issues associated with defining good judging and the purposes of evaluating judges, and ask such questions as: What values are central to the judicial role?
Francesco Contini   +2 more
doaj   +8 more sources

Evaluating Judicial Performance Evaluation: A Conceptual Analysis

open access: greenOñati Socio-Legal Series, 2014
While the performance evaluation of judges has become a ubiquitous aspect of modern judicial administration, evaluation mechanisms of are too often utilised uncritically, without reflection on why we evaluate judges, and how ‘measurement’ furthers these
Joe McIntyre
doaj   +7 more sources

Evaluating Performance in State Judicial Institutions: Trust and Confidence in the Georgia Judiciary [PDF]

open access: greenState and Local Government Review, 2006
Abstract ...
Dougherty, George W.   +2 more
  +5 more sources

Evaluating Judicial Performance for Caseload Allocation [PDF]

open access: green, 2019
This article examines the principles and processes governing the allocation of work to judicial officers in Australian courts. It investigates the extent to which implicit evaluation of judicial performance occurs as part of the workload allocation process.
Anne Wallace
  +5 more sources

Performance Evaluation of the Judicial Circuits of Mexico 2007-2010 [PDF]

open access: diamondRevista Internacional Consinter de Direito, 2021
The main objective of this document is to analyze empirically the effects of the introduction of the Results Based Budgeting (RBB) reform, specifically in the performance of the judicial circuits as part of the Judiciary of the Federation of Mexico and determine whether this administrative reform influences the demand, supply and quality of the Council
René Palacios Garita
openaire   +3 more sources

Innovating Judicial Performance Evaluations: Toward Academic-Style Peer Review?

open access: greenInternational Journal for Court Administration
Evaluating judicial performances is a crucial, albeit often underappreciated element of judicial governance, as it incentivizes judges’ productivity and allows for meritocratic career advancement within the judiciary. At the same time, judicial performance evaluation remains a daunting task, plagued by different recurring issues.
Silvio Roberto Vinceti
  +6 more sources

Sacrificing Diversity for 'Quality': How Judicial Performance Evaluations are Failing Women and Minorities

open access: greenSSRN Electronic Journal, 2010
Because voters rely on judicial performance evaluations when casting their ballots, it is important that policymakers work diligently to compile valid, reliable and unbiased information about our sitting judges. This paper analyzes attorney surveys of judicial performance in Nevada from 1998-2008.
Rebecca Gill   +2 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Enhancing forensic clinical competence through scenario-based simulation: A comparative study of educational outcomes in Chinese medical students. [PDF]

open access: yesPLoS ONE
IntroductionForensic clinical medicine examines injuries in living individuals and plays a critical role in criminal violence cases, trauma compensation, and judicial rulings.
Jiaqi Li   +6 more
doaj   +2 more sources

Implicit Gender Bias in State-Sponsored Judicial Performance Evaluations: A Preliminary Analysis of Colorado's JPE System, 2002-2012

open access: greenSSRN Electronic Journal, 2013
The Colorado system of judicial performance evaluations is the Cadillac of JPEs; they spend more money on their system than other states, and their system has been designed by experts. Even still, disparities in the scores of female and male judges persist. These disparities cannot be explained away using objective measures of judicial performance. The
Rebecca Gill, Kenneth J. Retzl
openaire   +2 more sources

Evaluating Judicial Performance and Addressing Gender Bias

open access: greenOñati Socio-Legal Series, 2014
Elek and Rottman argue that judicial evaluation is often biased against women and minority judges. The need to address bias is important, however often the desire for diversity seems so self-evident as to belie deeper analysis. This paper examines the two main rationales for gender equality on the bench.
Angela Melville
openaire   +3 more sources

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy