Results 191 to 200 of about 3,786 (246)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAMMES
Journal of Commonwealth Law and Legal Education, 2006This article examines judicial performance evaluation in the United States, Nova Scotia, England, and Australia. There are three distinct categories of judicial performance evaluation: traditional forms of accountability, including the principle of ‘open justice’ and appellate review; analysis of judicial attributes; and court and administrative ...
openaire +3 more sources
2010 Second International Conference on Computer Engineering and Applications, 2010
A time-honored maxim says that the judicial system is the last line of defending justice. Its performance has a great impact on how the citizen trust or distrust their state apparatus in a democracy. Technically speaking, the judicial process and its procedures are very complicated and the purpose of the whole system is to go through the law and due ...
Chih-Fong Tsai, Jung-Hsiang Tsai
openaire +3 more sources
A time-honored maxim says that the judicial system is the last line of defending justice. Its performance has a great impact on how the citizen trust or distrust their state apparatus in a democracy. Technically speaking, the judicial process and its procedures are very complicated and the purpose of the whole system is to go through the law and due ...
Chih-Fong Tsai, Jung-Hsiang Tsai
openaire +3 more sources
The Limits of Judicial Accountability; the Role of Judicial Performance Evaluation
Legal Ethics, 2003(2003). The Limits of Judicial Accountability; the Role of Judicial Performance Evaluation. Legal Ethics: Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 55-72.
openaire +1 more source
Evaluating Judicial Performance for Caseload Allocation
2019This article examines the principles and processes governing the allocation of work to judicial officers in Australian courts. It investigates the extent to which implicit evaluation of judicial performance occurs as part of the workload allocation process.
openaire +2 more sources
Evaluating Australian judicial performance [PDF]
Judicial performance evaluation involves three distinct approaches: firstly, traditional approaches such as public scrutiny and appellate review; secondly, analysis of judicial attributes such as legal ability, impartiality, integrity etc; and thirdly, court and administrative performance measurement, with its emphasis on time and motion of collective ...
openaire +1 more source
JPE 2.0: A Modern Approach to Evaluating Judicial Performance
SSRN Electronic Journal<span>This article shares the results of a multi-year, national effort to modernize judicial performance evaluation (JPE) programs, which are currently in use or under consideration in nearly twenty U.S. jurisdictions. In particular, it describes the genesis and work of the JPE 2.0 Project, a national effort undertaken by IAALS, the Institute for
Jordan M. Singer, Danielle Kalil
openaire +1 more source
Need for standardizing performance evaluation criteria for judicial magistrates in India
Commonwealth Law Bulletin, 2018This article, after deliberating on utility of performance evaluation (PE) for the judiciary and practices developed in different jurisdictions for PE, examines existing rules on PE of magistrates ...
openaire +1 more source
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2010
Because voters rely on judicial performance evaluations when casting their ballots, it is important that policymakers work diligently to compile valid, reliable and unbiased information about our sitting judges. This paper analyzes attorney surveys of judicial performance in Nevada from 1998-2008.
Rebecca Gill +2 more
openaire +1 more source
Because voters rely on judicial performance evaluations when casting their ballots, it is important that policymakers work diligently to compile valid, reliable and unbiased information about our sitting judges. This paper analyzes attorney surveys of judicial performance in Nevada from 1998-2008.
Rebecca Gill +2 more
openaire +1 more source
The Bench Speaks on Judicial Performance Evaluation: A Survey of Colorado Judges
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2009Since 1990, Colorado has maintained a state-operated judicial performance evaluation (JPE) program for appellate and trial court judges. The program is generally designed to serve four purposes: (1) providing voters in retention elections with information about the judges seeking retention; (2) educating the public about qualities and levels of ...
openaire +1 more source