Results 241 to 250 of about 2,739,656 (307)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAMMES
Journal of Commonwealth Law and Legal Education, 2006This article examines judicial performance evaluation in the United States, Nova Scotia, England, and Australia. There are three distinct categories of judicial performance evaluation: traditional forms of accountability, including the principle of ‘open justice’ and appellate review; analysis of judicial attributes; and court and administrative ...
Stephen B. Colbran
openaire +2 more sources
Need for standardizing performance evaluation criteria for judicial magistrates in India
Commonwealth Law Bulletin, 2018This article, after deliberating on utility of performance evaluation (PE) for the judiciary and practices developed in different jurisdictions for PE, examines existing rules on PE of magistrates ...
Geeta Oberoi
openaire +2 more sources
The Bench Speaks on Judicial Performance Evaluation: A Survey of Colorado Judges
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2009Since 1990, Colorado has maintained a state-operated judicial performance evaluation (JPE) program for appellate and trial court judges. The program is generally designed to serve four purposes: (1) providing voters in retention elections with information about the judges seeking retention; (2) educating the public about qualities and levels of ...
Iaals
openaire +2 more sources
The Journal of Legal Studies, 2015
AbstractWhich judges are “good” at their jobs, and which are not? The answer may depend on the ideology of whom you ask. Judicial decisions inevitably involve policy making, and lawyers may prefer judges whose policy preferences match their own. This paper tests that prediction with online evaluations of judges.
T. Miles
openaire +2 more sources
AbstractWhich judges are “good” at their jobs, and which are not? The answer may depend on the ideology of whom you ask. Judicial decisions inevitably involve policy making, and lawyers may prefer judges whose policy preferences match their own. This paper tests that prediction with online evaluations of judges.
T. Miles
openaire +2 more sources
Crime, Law and Social Change, 2018
Through participatory observation and in-depth interviews with thirty-four practitioners, this article pierces the veil of the dynamics of China’s pretrial detention system by looking into various socio-legal factors which may affect law enforcement in China.
Xifen Lin, Wei Shen
openaire +2 more sources
Through participatory observation and in-depth interviews with thirty-four practitioners, this article pierces the veil of the dynamics of China’s pretrial detention system by looking into various socio-legal factors which may affect law enforcement in China.
Xifen Lin, Wei Shen
openaire +2 more sources
2010 Second International Conference on Computer Engineering and Applications, 2010
A time-honored maxim says that the judicial system is the last line of defending justice. Its performance has a great impact on how the citizen trust or distrust their state apparatus in a democracy. Technically speaking, the judicial process and its procedures are very complicated and the purpose of the whole system is to go through the law and due ...
Chih-Fong Tsai, Jung-Hsiang Tsai
openaire +2 more sources
A time-honored maxim says that the judicial system is the last line of defending justice. Its performance has a great impact on how the citizen trust or distrust their state apparatus in a democracy. Technically speaking, the judicial process and its procedures are very complicated and the purpose of the whole system is to go through the law and due ...
Chih-Fong Tsai, Jung-Hsiang Tsai
openaire +2 more sources
Unconscious Bias in Judicial Performance Evaluations: Why the ABA Guidelines are Not Good Enough
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2012Judicial performance evaluations (JPEs) are an important part of the judicial selection process in the states, particularly those using a version of the merit plan. All states that use JPEs follow the ABA’s Guidelines (1985), which claim to minimize the potential for unconscious bias through the use of behavior-based evaluation. But these measures have
Rebecca D. Gill
openaire +2 more sources
Judicial Performance Evaluation in the States: The IAALS JPE 2.0 Pre-Convening White Paper
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2023Jordan M. Singer
openaire +2 more sources
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2012
Judicial performance evaluations (JPEs) are an important part of the judicial selection process in the states, particularly those using a version of the merit plan. All states that use JPEs follow the ABA’s Guidelines (1985), which claim to minimize the potential for unconscious bias through the use of behavior-based evaluation. But these measures have
Rebecca D. Gill
openaire +2 more sources
Judicial performance evaluations (JPEs) are an important part of the judicial selection process in the states, particularly those using a version of the merit plan. All states that use JPEs follow the ABA’s Guidelines (1985), which claim to minimize the potential for unconscious bias through the use of behavior-based evaluation. But these measures have
Rebecca D. Gill
openaire +2 more sources
Law & Society Review, 2011
Because voters rely on judicial performance evaluations when casting their ballots, policymakers should work diligently to compile valid, reliable, and unbiased information about our sitting judges. Although some claim that judicial performance evaluations are fair, the systematic research needed to establish such a proposition has not been done.
Gill, Rebecca D. +2 more
openaire +3 more sources
Because voters rely on judicial performance evaluations when casting their ballots, policymakers should work diligently to compile valid, reliable, and unbiased information about our sitting judges. Although some claim that judicial performance evaluations are fair, the systematic research needed to establish such a proposition has not been done.
Gill, Rebecca D. +2 more
openaire +3 more sources