Results 151 to 160 of about 1,486 (199)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
2009
The jus ad bellum is generally viewed as a static field of law. The standard account is that when the UN Charter was adopted in 1945, it enshrined a complete prohibition on the use of force in inter-state relations, except when action is being taken in self-defense against an armed attack or under authorization of the UN Security Council.
openaire +1 more source
The jus ad bellum is generally viewed as a static field of law. The standard account is that when the UN Charter was adopted in 1945, it enshrined a complete prohibition on the use of force in inter-state relations, except when action is being taken in self-defense against an armed attack or under authorization of the UN Security Council.
openaire +1 more source
2018
This chapter argues for greatly expanding the scope of just war theorizing. Once one realizes that institutions matter to the morality of war, the list of issues that just war theory should address expands greatly beyond the question of what are the criteria for the rightness of war-making acts.
openaire +1 more source
This chapter argues for greatly expanding the scope of just war theorizing. Once one realizes that institutions matter to the morality of war, the list of issues that just war theory should address expands greatly beyond the question of what are the criteria for the rightness of war-making acts.
openaire +1 more source
Jus ad bellum, jus in bello , l'enfance meurtrie
Le Télémaque, 2012Résumé La souffrance ou la mort de l’enfant outrepassent tout droit de la guerre ou toute régulation morale ou politique de la violence, au cours des guerres et au-delà. La prise d’otages d’enfants dans une école, le massacre d’enfants sous des bombardements invalident l’idée même de guerre “juste”.
openaire +1 more source
, 2013 Jus ad Bellum and International Terrorism
2003The central domain in international law is legal regulation of use of force. This chapter commences with an overview of how the attitude of international law towards the use of military force has reached the current stage. There is no consensus on how to deal with new global threats such as civil wars, humanitarian emergencies, international terrorism ...
openaire +1 more source
Toward Reconstructing the Jus Ad Bellum
Monist, 1973In its classic form-the doctrine of the just war, whether enun ciated by theological or secular theorists, had two main components: the jus ad bellum, which defined the morally acceptable limits within which a sovereign could and even should go to war, and the jus in bello, which set limits to the conduct of war. By contrast, to day the problem of just
openaire +1 more source
Underground Warfare and the Jus ad Bellum
2018This chapter discusses situations in which cross-border tunnels may lead to the outbreak of war. Cross-border tunnels violate sovereignty and territorial integrity and demonstrate hostile intent on the part of the neighboring entity. Various factors influence the victim state’s decision to go to war in such situations, such as the number of tunnels ...
openaire +1 more source
Evaluating Drones with Jus ad bellum
2016This chapter considers the moral arguments for and against drones that fall under the scope of jus ad bellum, which is the domain of just war theory that determines when it is permissible to wage a war. Drones introduce substantial benefits when it comes to satisfying the principles of proportionality and last resort.
openaire +1 more source