Results 11 to 20 of about 14,140 (201)
Autonomous weapon systems and jus ad bellum
AbstractIn this article, we focus on the scholarly and policy debate on autonomous weapon systems (AWS) and particularly on the objections to the use of these weapons which rest on jus ad bellum principles of proportionality and last resort. Both objections rest on the idea that AWS may increase the incidence of war by reducing the costs for going to ...
Alexander Blanchard, Mariarosaria Taddeo
openaire +3 more sources
“In Defence of Jus Ad Bellum Criteria”
AbstractIn this contribution, I defend the standard list of jus ad bellum principles. In The Ethics of War and the Force of Law: A Modern Just War Theory, Uwe Steinhoff endorses only three principles of jus ad bellum (right intention, just cause, and proportionality) and claims that the others are redundant. I argue that, although fundamentally all jus
openaire +3 more sources
Since Grotius' De Jure Belli ac Pacis, the architecture of the international legal system has been founded upon a distinction between the states of war and peace. At the beginning of the 20th century, it was taken for granted that "the law recognizes a state of peace and a state of war, but that it knows nothing of an intermediate state which is ...
openaire +5 more sources
International Humanitarian Law and the Immunity of Hospitals in Gaza. [PDF]
ABSTRACT International Humanitarian Law (IHL), specifically Article 18 of the IV Geneva Convention, affords special protection to civilian hospitals. This special protection is waived, however, under certain circumstances specified in Article 19. Such conditions to waive the special protection of hospitals are now being used by Israel to justify the ...
Lederman Z.
europepmc +2 more sources
Violence against humanitarians is a commonplace phenomenon in contemporary armed conflict. This paper examines how the manipulation of international legal principles for political or military purposes, a practice known as ‘lawfare’, impacts humanitarian security in conflict‐affected areas.
Iida‐Maria Tammi
wiley +1 more source
Should Autonomous Weapons Need a Reason to Kill?
ABSTRACT Purves et al. argue against deploying automated weapons because they fail to act for the right reason. Given that soldiers do not necessarily act in an ideal way, I argue that it is morally preferable to deploy autonomous weapons that are incapable of acting for the wrong reason over combatants that are likely (although not guaranteed) to act ...
Garry Young
wiley +1 more source
Assisting Rebels Abroad: The Ethics of Violence at the Limits of the Defensive Paradigm
Abstract In this article, I analyse the theory and practice of interventions in foreign civil wars to assist rebels fighting against violently oppressive government. I argue that the indirect nature of this kind of intervention gives rise to political complications that are either absent from or less obvious in humanitarian interventions aimed chiefly ...
Christopher J. Finlay
wiley +1 more source
Attitudes toward the Use of Force: Instrumental Imperatives, Moral Principles, and International Law
Abstract What informs ordinary citizens' attitudes toward the use of force? Previous research identifies several key concerns in public opinion toward war, but does not directly evaluate the relative importance of these considerations. We articulate three distinct logics of war support—moral, legal, and instrumental—and use an experimental survey with ...
Janina Dill, Livia I. Schubiger
wiley +1 more source
Abstract In light of recent reevaluations of the work of Hugo Grotius, this essay analyzes the respective roles of Francisco de Vitoria and Grotius in the construction of the “Grotian tradition” of international law and human rights. In contrast to conventional accounts which understand the two within a progression, this essay argues that Vitoria and ...
John E. Carter
wiley +1 more source
Philosophy &Public Affairs, Volume 51, Issue 1, Page 33-59, Winter 2023.
David J. Clark
wiley +1 more source

