Results 11 to 20 of about 1,382,423 (187)

Identifying the Jus Cogens Norm in the Jus Ad Bellum [PDF]

open access: yesSSRN Electronic Journal, 2021
AbstractThis article argues that if there is a jus cogens norm in the jus ad bellum, it must be the customary norm which prohibits non-consensual uses of force that are neither validly authorised under the UN Charter nor lawful exercises of self-defence.
Johnston, Katie A
openaire   +2 more sources

Commissions of Inquiry and the Jus ad Bellum [PDF]

open access: yes, 2018
Commissions of inquiry are not among the protagonists within the jus ad bellum architecture. Nonetheless, historically, several international commissions have been established in different institutional settings specifically to inquire into situations involving the use of force. These include theDogger Bank Inquiry into Russian firing at a U.K. trawler,
Harwood, C.E.M., Herik, L.J. van den
openaire   +4 more sources

International Humanitarian Law and the Immunity of Hospitals in Gaza. [PDF]

open access: yesBioethics
ABSTRACT International Humanitarian Law (IHL), specifically Article 18 of the IV Geneva Convention, affords special protection to civilian hospitals. This special protection is waived, however, under certain circumstances specified in Article 19. Such conditions to waive the special protection of hospitals are now being used by Israel to justify the ...
Lederman Z.
europepmc   +2 more sources

War-Related Disruptions and Health Service Outcomes Among Internally Displaced Persons in Tigray, Ethiopia: Evidence From Adigrat City. [PDF]

open access: yesPublic Health Chall
ABSTRACT Internally displaced persons (IDPs) are individuals or groups forced to leave their homes due to conflict, violence, or other coercive circumstances. This study examined the effects of armed conflict on health service availability and outcomes for IDPs residing in designated centers in Adigrat City, Tigray region, Ethiopia.
Tekulu FB   +3 more
europepmc   +2 more sources

Arguing about the Jus ad Bellum [PDF]

open access: yes, 2021
Quite a bit of research suggests that international law’s argumentative practice has value insofar as it leads to or affirms some kind of normative settlement. This chapter uses the argumentative practice in the jus ad bellum to counter that view.
Monica Hakimi, Hakimi, Monica
core   +5 more sources

The Jus Ad Bellum\u27s Regulatory Form [PDF]

open access: yes, 2018
This article argues that a form of legal regulation is embodied in decisions at the UN Security Council that condone but do not formally authorize specific military operations.
Monica Hakimi, Hakimi, Monica
core   +5 more sources

Jus ad bellum and jus in bello in New wars

open access: yes, 2018
Savaş kavramı, Soğuk Savaş'ın bitişinden bu yana, özellikle de daha yakın tarihteki Amerika Birleşik Devletleri'nin teröre karşı savaş politikasını takiben, dönüşüm geçirmektedir. Değişmekte olan savaş kavramı, jus ad bellum ve jus in bello normlarının tartışılmasına yol açmıştır.
Gökçer, Onur
openaire   +3 more sources

Internal Jus ad Bellum [PDF]

open access: yes, 2016
In 1945, the United Nations Charter famously set out “to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war.” Having in mind traditional interstate wars, the Charter’s Article 2(4) outlawed, for the first time, interstate uses of force.
Lieblich, Eliav
core   +3 more sources

Fighting with words: humanitarian security and the changing role of law in contemporary armed conflict

open access: yesDisasters, Volume 47, Issue 4, Page 870-890, October 2023., 2023
Violence against humanitarians is a commonplace phenomenon in contemporary armed conflict. This paper examines how the manipulation of international legal principles for political or military purposes, a practice known as ‘lawfare’, impacts humanitarian security in conflict‐affected areas.
Iida‐Maria Tammi
wiley   +1 more source

Should Autonomous Weapons Need a Reason to Kill?

open access: yesJournal of Applied Philosophy, Volume 39, Issue 5, Page 886-900, November 2022., 2022
ABSTRACT Purves et al. argue against deploying automated weapons because they fail to act for the right reason. Given that soldiers do not necessarily act in an ideal way, I argue that it is morally preferable to deploy autonomous weapons that are incapable of acting for the wrong reason over combatants that are likely (although not guaranteed) to act ...
Garry Young
wiley   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy