Results 191 to 200 of about 16,853 (243)

Toward Reconstructing the Jus Ad Bellum

Monist, 1973
In its classic form-the doctrine of the just war, whether enun ciated by theological or secular theorists, had two main components: the jus ad bellum, which defined the morally acceptable limits within which a sovereign could and even should go to war, and the jus in bello, which set limits to the conduct of war. By contrast, to day the problem of just
openaire   +1 more source

Jus Ad Bellum, Jus in Bello and Non-International Armed Conflicts

Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law, 2003
Of all the calamities that can befall a people or a state, civil war has always been considered one of the worst. Setting son against father, brother against brother and neighbour against neighbour, civil war is a merciless struggle that is not limited to the clash of armed forces.
openaire   +1 more source

The New Jus ad Bellum

2022
Abstract This chapter presents the decision to treat Al Qaeda terrorists as enemies that could be killed in any country rather than consider them as criminals. It analyzes the options to face the conflict that the Bush administration did not contemplate, including making efforts to arrest and prosecute before US courts Osama bin Laden ...
openaire   +1 more source

Military Intervention on Request in Jus ad Bellum and Jus in Bello and the Question of Recognition of Governments

Social Science Research Network, 2023
C. Redaelli
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Aid and Assistance as a 'Use of Force' Under the Jus Ad Bellum

Social Science Research Network, 2023
M. Schmitt, W. Biggerstaff
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Jus ad Bellum and International Terrorism

2003
The central domain in international law is legal regulation of use of force. This chapter commences with an overview of how the attitude of international law towards the use of military force has reached the current stage. There is no consensus on how to deal with new global threats such as civil wars, humanitarian emergencies, international terrorism ...
openaire   +1 more source

Evaluating Drones with Jus ad bellum

2016
This chapter considers the moral arguments for and against drones that fall under the scope of jus ad bellum, which is the domain of just war theory that determines when it is permissible to wage a war. Drones introduce substantial benefits when it comes to satisfying the principles of proportionality and last resort.
openaire   +1 more source

Jus ad bellum

2022
openaire   +1 more source

Jus ad Bellum

2020
openaire   +2 more sources

Some Remarks on Compensation for War Damages under Jus ad Bellum

The 1998–2000 Eritrea-Ethiopia War and Its Aftermath in International Legal Perspective, 2021
Vera Gowlland-Debbas
semanticscholar   +1 more source