Results 131 to 140 of about 2,675,823 (174)
A methodology for establishing an ontology‐augmented structural digital twin for fiber‐reinforced polymer structures dedicated to individual lifetime prediction, in this case, a wind turbine rotor blade, is introduced. The methodology resembles the manufacturing as well as the operation of the structure.
Marc Luger+6 more
wiley +1 more source
This article introduces the Dataspace Management System (DSMS), a methodological framework realized in software, designed as a technology stack to power dataspaces with a focus on advanced knowledge management in materials science and manufacturing. DSMS leverages heterogeneous data through semantic integration, linkage, and visualization, aligned with
Yoav Nahshon+7 more
wiley +1 more source
Knowledge Representation and Knowledge Reasoning in Square{most} and Square{all}
Feifei Yang, Xiaojun Zhang
openalex +1 more source
In pursuit of modern data management techniques, this study presents an in‐lab pipeline combining electronic laboratory notebooks (eLabFTW) and Python scripts for creating semantically enriched, interoperable, machine‐actionable data. Automating data mapping enhances usability, collaboration, and unified knowledge representation.
Markus Schilling+7 more
wiley +1 more source
Knowledge representation and reasoning in the design of composite systems [PDF]
Stephen Fickas, Björn Helm
openalex +1 more source
Ontologies for FAIR Data in Additive Manufacturing: A Use Case‐Based Evaluation
An ontology‐based approach for generating findable, accessible, interoperable, reusable data in additive manufacturing is explored, focusing on powder bed fusion. The article highlights the benefits of enhanced data findability and digital twin enablement, while addressing challenges like data integration complexity and the need for specialized ...
Thomas Bjarsch+2 more
wiley +1 more source
Robot Representation and Reasoning with Knowledge from Reinforcement Learning
Keting Lu+3 more
openalex +2 more sources
This article provides examples of ontology development in the materials science domain (use‐case of Brinell hardness testing) and gives ontology developers an overview for selecting their desired top‐level ontologies (e.g., BFO, EMMO, PROVO) by considering different evaluation parameters like semantic richness, domain coverage, extensibility ...
Hossein Beygi Nasrabadi+3 more
wiley +1 more source