Results 11 to 20 of about 10,998 (222)

Flap Thickness and the Risk of Complications in Mechanical Microkeratome and Femtosecond Laser In Situ Keratomileusis: A Literature Review and Statistical Analysis

open access: yesDiagnostics, 2021
Introduction: A recent Cochrane review found no difference in visual acuity outcomes between femtosecond-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and LASIK using mechanical microkeratomes (MMKs).
Piotr Kanclerz, Ramin Khoramnia
doaj   +3 more sources

Concurrent laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis with high-fluence cross-linking versus laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis only in treatment of hyperopia

open access: yesJournal of the Egyptian Ophthalmological Society, 2019
Purpose To compare refractive and corneal structural stability after laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with and without concurrent prophylactic high-fluence cross-linking in the treatment of hyperopia.
Ahmed M Eid   +3 more
doaj   +1 more source

Interface fluid syndrome: A potential lifelong complication after LASIK. A case report

open access: yesAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports, 2018
Purpose: To describe a case of interface fluid formation caused by uncontrollable intraocular pressure (IOP) 16 years after laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery secondary to Posner Schlossman Syndrome (PSS).
Zhe Jia   +5 more
doaj   +1 more source

Complications of laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis

open access: yesIndian Journal of Ophthalmology, 2021
Laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) is one of the most commonly performed kerato-refractive surgery globally. Since its introduction in 1990, there has been a constant evolution in its technology to improve the visual outcome.
Pranita Sahay   +4 more
doaj   +1 more source

Epithelial ingrowth following laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK): prevalence, risk factors, management and visual outcomes [PDF]

open access: yes, 2018
The number of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) procedures is continuing to rise. Since its first application for correcting simple refractive errors over 25 years ago, the role of LASIK has extended to treat other conditions, including ...
Danjoux, Jean-Pierre   +2 more
core   +1 more source

Femtosecond Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis Treatment of Residual Refractive Error following Femtosecond Laser-Enabled Keratoplasty. [PDF]

open access: yes, 2019
Purpose:To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in the treatment of residual myopia and astigmatism following femtosecond laser-enabled keratoplasty (FLEK).
Farid, Marjan   +4 more
core   +1 more source

Frequency doubling technology in patients submitted to laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK): cost-benefit analysis [PDF]

open access: yes, 2003
PURPOSE: To check if there is functional damage to magnocellular cells using the frequency doubling technology (FDT), after laser assisted in situ keratomileusis-LASIK intraocular pressure increase and to analyze the benefit of this test in patients ...
Aires, Rejane Carvalho   +3 more
core   +4 more sources

Comparison of Sub-Bowman Keratoplasty Laser In situ Keratomileusis Flap Properties between Microkeratome and Femtosecond Laser

open access: yesAdvanced Biomedical Research, 2017
Background: Since thin and high-quality flaps produce more satisfactory surgical outcomes, flaps created by mechanical microkeratomes are more economical as compared with femtosecond lasers, and no Iranian study has concentrated laser in situ ...
Farhad Fazel   +4 more
doaj   +1 more source

Confocal and Histological Features After Poly(Ethylene Glycol) Diacrylate Corneal Inlay Implantation [PDF]

open access: yes, 2019
Purpose: To evaluate the in vivo biocompatibility of photopolymerized poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEGDA) intrastromal inlays in rabbit corneas. Methods: Sixty-three eyes of 42 New Zealand rabbits were included.
Bidaguren, Aritz   +3 more
core   +2 more sources

Bowman Keratomileusis: Better than Laser Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK)?

open access: yesDelhi Journal of Ophthalmology, 2012
The most important factor in undertaking a refractive procedure is that we need to be within the stroma to make it comfortable to the patient. But, from a biomechanical standpoint, we need to be as superficial as we can.
Savleen Kaur, Sparshi Jain
doaj   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy