Results 181 to 190 of about 6,300 (221)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
The Le Fort III Osteotomy: To Distract or Not to Distract?
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2001Treatment of the craniofacial dysostoses (e.g., Crouzon, Apert, Pfeiffer, Saethre-Chotzen syndromes) is critically dependent on the successful advancement of the midface with a Le Fort III procedure. The purpose of this retrospective clinical outcome study was to evaluate a new technique for distracting the Le Fort III procedure and to compare its ...
openaire +2 more sources
Le Fort I Osteotomy – Development of Total Maxillary Osteotomies
The last five decades have seen decisive advances in orthognathic surgery in terms of surgical techniques and outcomes in the treatment of dysgnathic maxillofacial malocclusion and deformities. However, despite brilliant technical innovations, the basic surgical principles have remained unchanged.Kessler, Peter, Hardt, Nicolas
openaire +2 more sources
Simultaneous Modified Oblique Le Fort III and Segmentalized Le Fort I Osteotomies
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2010From the literature, the number of studies reporting the use of the Le Fort III osteotomy or its modifications in correcting nonsyndromic midface hypoplasia is small. This report describes the application of a modified oblique Le Fort III osteotomy that includes the nasal bones and in combination with a segmentalized Le Fort I osteotomy in the ...
Chua, HDP, Cheung, LK, Ow, A
openaire +4 more sources
General Rules in Le Fort Osteotomies: Six Steps
The Le Fort osteotomies are composed of a logical sequence of surgical steps that must be consistently followed during each procedure in order to operate successfully, with clarity and safely. Basically six surgical steps can be distinguished, from incision to osteosynthesis.Kessler, Peter +3 more
openaire +2 more sources
Miniplate Fixation of Le Fort I Osteotomies
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1986The use of rigid, internal, three-dimensional fixation using vitallium bone plates in 28 consecutive Le Fort I osteotomies is presented. A minimum follow-up period of 6 months was required for inclusion in this patient group. Maxillary movements included advancements (17), intrusions (9), lengthenings (5), and retrusions (2).
openaire +2 more sources
Le Fort III and Le Fort II Osteotomies
Atlas of the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics, 2016David D, Vu, Paul S, Tiwana
openaire +2 more sources
Modifications in the Le Fort III osteotomy
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 1985M C, Kinnebrew, W R, Dzyak
openaire +2 more sources
Clinical Anatomy and the Le Fort Osteotomies
Bernhard von Langenbeck from Berlin performed the first Le Fort I osteotomy in 1859. A few years later, in 1867, Cheever removed a nasopharyngeal tumor by maxillary osteot-omy using the first total maxillary downfracture method. Moloney and Worthington (J Oral Surg 39:1278-82, 1981) and Wassmund (Lehrbuch der praktischen Chirurgie des Mundes und der ...Kessler, Peter, Hardt, Nicolas
openaire +2 more sources
Segmented Le Fort I Osteotomies
The most common bignathic osteotomy techniques currently used to correct growth-related sagittal, vertical, and transverse deviations, as in syndromal and non-syndromal maldevelopments, involve Le Fort osteotomies in combination with splitting techniques in the mandible.Kessler, Peter +2 more
openaire +2 more sources

