Results 11 to 20 of about 40,417 (260)
On Legal Teleological Reasoning
Given a common pool of facts and legal rules, Judges on a panel may form different justifications for decisions, which are then voted upon. It is clear that a Judge’s personal values and purposes play in developing their opinion, which is a form of teleological reasoning.
Adam Z. Wyner, Tomasz Zurek
openaire +3 more sources
Justifying Particular Reasoning in a Legal Context
Particular reasoning is arguably the most common type of legal reasoning. Neil MacCormick proposed that, in a legal context, justifiable particular reasoning has to be universalizable.
Jingjing Wu
doaj +1 more source
Legal prejudices to sylogism. A confusion between form and conent
This text holds that some of the prejudices and preventions to the use of legal syllogism, as the way of reasoning or making legal decisions, result from a confusion in comprehension of what a syllogistic reasoning is.
Gregorio Posada Ramírez +2 more
doaj +1 more source
PENAFSIRAN, PENALARAN, DAN ARGUMENTASI HUKUM YANG RASIONAL
Indonesia applys civil law system which emphasizes on written law. This is why almost ail Indonesian positive laws are written law. Implementation of written laws needs rational legal interpretation, legal reasoning and legal argumentation in order to be
Tommy Hendra Purwaka
doaj +1 more source
Why Legal Reasoning has to be Unique
This article addresses the issue of the uniqueness of legal reasoning and, specifically, the author advances the thesis that what makes legal reasoning different from the reasoning employed in demonstrative and empirical sciences and matters of ...
Maciej Koszowski
doaj +1 more source
Legal Reasoning for Hedgehogs [PDF]
Amalia Amaya’s book The Tapestry of Reason (Amaya 2015) is a sophisticated, scholarly, and far-ranging examination of the nature of coherence in various areas of philosophy, and in legal reasoning in particular. It might be described, with a nod to Dworkin’s later comprehensive theory of value (2011), as a theory of legal reasoning for hedgehogs ...
openaire +1 more source
Teisinis samprotavimas: argumentacinis metodologinis požiūris
Teisinis argumentavimas, samprotavimas, teisės aiškinimas – susiję, sutampantys, o kartais tapatinami teise grįsto sprendimo priėmimo proceso aspektai. Lietuviškoje teisės doktrinoje plačiau analizuojama teisės aiškinimo, interpretavimo problematika, o ...
Eglė Mackuvienė
doaj +1 more source
This paper examines four religious courts’ decisions on child legal status, especially child parentage, after Constitutional Court’s decision on the legal status of child born out of wedlock.
Muhamad Isna Wahyudi
doaj +1 more source
Justification, documentation and reasoning of the court's verdict and judging the guarantee of its execution [PDF]
A reasoned opinion is a decision that a judge and an arbitrator identify, analyze and describe all aspects of the action and the legal event. The purpose of the documentary vote is to find a legal framework for the event or legal act.
javad niknejad, javad niknejad
doaj +1 more source
Legal Writing and Legal Reasoning [PDF]
Abstract The writings of Roman jurists from the first until the third century AD show different methodological approaches to law. These differences do not only occur between different jurists, but can be found within the work of one juridical author.
openaire +2 more sources

