Results 51 to 60 of about 779,335 (347)

Building A Legal Reasoning Based on Environmental Conservation in Indonesia [PDF]

, 2023
Tri Indreswari
openalex   +1 more source

Association of Corticospinal Tract Asymmetry With Ambulatory Ability After Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology, EarlyView.
ABSTRACT Background Ambulatory ability after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is important to patients. We tested whether asymmetry between ipsi‐ and contra‐lesional corticospinal tracts (CSTs) assessed by diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is associated with post‐ICH ambulation.
Yasmin N. Aziz, Carl D. Langefeld, Mary E. Comeau, Miranda C. Marion, Tyler P. Behymer, Lee A. Gilkerson, Padmini Sekar, Weihong Yuan, Vivek Khandwala, Brady J. Williamson, Thomas Maloney, Achala Vagal, Pierce Boyne, Kari Dunning, Matthew L. Flaherty, Steven J. Kittner, Prachi Mehndiratta, Gunjan Y. Parikh, Michael L. James, David Roh, Fernando D. Testai, Farhaan S. Vahidy, James Thornton, Ranjit Bagga, Daniel Woo, Stacie L. Demel   +25 more
wiley   +1 more source

KONSTRUKSI EPISTEMOLOGIS PENALARAN HUKUM IMAM SYÂFI’Î Asep Opik Akbar

Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, 2015
Epistemological Construction of Imam Syâfi’î Legal Reasoning. Imam Syâfi’î has a major contribution in laying the foundation and methodological principles of Islamic law (ushûl al-fiqh), supporting a strong unity between the Alquran and the Sunah as well
Asep Opik Akbar
doaj   +1 more source

Using Argumentation Schemes to Model Legal Reasoning [PDF]

, 2022
Trevor Bench‐Capon, Katie Atkinson
openalex   +1 more source

Age‐Related Characteristics of SYT1‐Associated Neurodevelopmental Disorder

Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology, EarlyView.
ABSTRACT Objectives We describe the clinical manifestations and developmental abilities of individuals with SYT1‐associated neurodevelopmental disorder (Baker‐Gordon syndrome) from infancy to adulthood. We further describe the neuroradiological and electrophysiological characteristics of the condition at different ages, and explore the associations ...
Sam G. Norwitz, Josefine Eck, Joel S. Winston, Kate Baker   +3 more
wiley   +1 more source

DIKWP Semantic Judicial Reasoning: A Framework for Semantic Justice in AI and Law

Information
Semantic modeling of legal reasoning is an important research direction in the field of artificial intelligence and law (AI and law), aiming to enhance judicial transparency, fairness, and the consistency of legal applications through structured semantic
Yingtian Mei, Yucong Duan
doaj   +1 more source

(IR) RATIONALITY IN THE JUSTIFICATION OF JUDICIAL DECISIONS AS A DETERMINING FACTOR FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF THE BINDING PRECEDENT

Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual, 2021
The study seeks to analyze the relevance of identifying the ratio decidendi in the application of the judicial precedent, presenting the difficulty in carrying out this task, in the face of the lack of argumentative rationality in the decisions handed ...
Tatiana Paula da Cruz
doaj   +1 more source

Legal Reasoning for Hedgehogs [PDF]

Ratio Juris, 2017
Amalia Amaya’s book The Tapestry of Reason (Amaya 2015) is a sophisticated, scholarly, and far-ranging examination of the nature of coherence in various areas of philosophy, and in legal reasoning in particular. It might be described, with a nod to Dworkin’s later comprehensive theory of value (2011), as a theory of legal reasoning for hedgehogs ...
openaire   +1 more source

Super‐Refractory Status Epilepticus (SRSE) in a Patient With Compound Heterozygous OPA1 Variants: Case Report and Literature Review

Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology, EarlyView.
ABSTRACT Objective Super‐Refractory Status Epilepticus (SRSE) is a rare, life‐threatening neurological emergency with unclear etiology in many cases. Mitochondrial dysfunction, often due to disease‐causing genetic variants, is increasingly recognized as a cause, with each gene producing distinct pathophysiological mechanisms.
Pouria Mohammadi, Lara Basovic, Christopher Michael McGraw   +2 more
wiley   +1 more source

Peculiaridades da argumentação sobre fatos no campo do direito

Teoria Jurídica Contemporânea, 2016
Resumo: A argumentação jurídica é frequentemente caracterizada como uma espécie particularmente formal, engessada ou “institucionalg de argumentação. Autores que concordam com essa caracterização da argumentação jurídica costumam ter em mente argumentos ...
Fábio Shecaira, Noel Struchiner
doaj   +1 more source