Results 251 to 260 of about 2,679,165 (308)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2009
This paper contains an argument to the effect that the proper method for legal science depends on what one takes to be the nature of science, the nature of the law and the kind of questions that are addressed in legal science. It starts from three assumptions, namely that: a. science is the collaborative pursuit of knowledge, b.
openaire +1 more source
This paper contains an argument to the effect that the proper method for legal science depends on what one takes to be the nature of science, the nature of the law and the kind of questions that are addressed in legal science. It starts from three assumptions, namely that: a. science is the collaborative pursuit of knowledge, b.
openaire +1 more source
Anomalies of Normal Legal Science, Applications of User-Friendly Legal Science
2017The purpose of this chapter is to show that many existing doctrinal disciplines can be upgraded into scientific disciplines if you use the scientific framework of User-friendly Legal Science. Moreover, User-friendly Legal Science can help to address some anomalies of normal legal science.
openaire +1 more source
About Legal Science and Legal Craft
ZakonEvery serious lawyer in his professional life is faced with a situation when, coming into contact with unknown legal matter in his work, revealing the meaning of legal norms or legal institutions, he finds an unexpected way out of the impasse, discovering something new in law. May such work of a lawyer be called a scientific one?
openaire +1 more source
Legal Systems and Legal Science
1998Cura di "Legal Systems and Legal Science"
openaire +1 more source
1994
Abstract Langdell was not alone in thinking about legal science. Langdell’s construct was only one current in a broad stream of change. Even as the new dean was settling into his work in Dane Hall, a small group of young men in the Boston area had been investigating legal science for some years, discussing their findings in a group that ...
openaire +1 more source
Abstract Langdell was not alone in thinking about legal science. Langdell’s construct was only one current in a broad stream of change. Even as the new dean was settling into his work in Dane Hall, a small group of young men in the Boston area had been investigating legal science for some years, discussing their findings in a group that ...
openaire +1 more source
Interpretation in Legal Science
1990In his definition of interpretation, Kelsen1 gave a decisive critique of the “strict positivist” method: “If ‘interpretation’ is understood as cognitive ascertainment of the meanings of the object that is to be interpreted, then the result of a legal interpretation can only be the ascertainment of the frame which the law to be interpreted represents ...
openaire +1 more source

