Results 191 to 200 of about 115,690 (231)

Giant Isotope Effect in Metal-Organic Frameworks Boosts Unprecedented Photo- and Radio-Luminescence Enhancement. [PDF]

Adv Sci (Weinh)
Lu J, Zhou D, Hao X, Lu H, Zhang Z, Jia Y, Mei S, Huang Y, Tang S, Peng Z, Chen L, Yuan M, Chen L, Wang S, Feng M, Wang Y, Wang S.   +16 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Pig Health Assessment Framework Based on Behavioural Analysis. [PDF]

Animals (Basel)
Tu S, Tan B, Yang A, Yang H, Luo Y, Fang Y, Xu Z.   +6 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Lie detection: Cognitive Processes

openaire   +1 more source

Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Related searches:

On lie detection "Wizards."

Law and Human Behavior, 2007
M. O'Sullivan and P. Ekman (2004) claim to have discovered 29 wizards of deception detection. The present commentary offers a statistical critique of the evidence for this claim. Analyses reveal that chance can explain results that the authors attribute to wizardry.
Charles F, Bond, Ahmet, Uysal
openaire   +2 more sources

Lie Detection: fMRI

2019
Objective detection of deception was extensively studied, starting from polygraph to more modern techniques, the functional MR (fMRI), and they are based on neural (sympathetic) activation that is evoked in stressful conditions, such as lying. The role of fMRI in neurophysiology has been extensively developed and studied, and its principles lie in the ...
La Tona G., Terranova M. C., Vernuccio F., Lo Re G., Salerno S., Zerbo S., Argo A.   +6 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Lie detection and language comprehension

Nature, 2000
People who can't understand words are better at picking up lies about emotions. People are usually no better than chance at detecting lies from a liar's demeanour1,2, even when clues to deceit are evident from facial expression and tone of voice3. We suspected that people who are unable to understand words (aphasics) may be better at spotting liars, so
N L, Etcoff, P, Ekman, J J, Magee, M G, Frank   +3 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Forensic “Lie Detection”

Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 2001
Abstract This paper provides a critical overview of the scientific status of the control question test (CQT), the type of polygraph test most likely to be used in forensic settings. The CQT is based on an implausible set of assumptions that makes it biased against innocent individuals and easy for guilty persons to defeat using countermea-sures. Due to
openaire   +1 more source

Police lie detection accuracy: The effect of lie scenario.

Law and Human Behavior, 2009
Although most people are not better than chance in detecting deception, some groups of police professionals have demonstrated significant lie detection accuracy. One reason for this difference may be that the types of lies police are asked to judge in scientific experiments often do not represent the types of lies they see in their profession.
Maureen, O'Sullivan, Mark G, Frank, Carolyn M, Hurley, Jaspreet, Tiwana   +3 more
openaire   +2 more sources

“Lie to me”—Oxytocin impairs lie detection between sexes

Psychoneuroendocrinology, 2017
The hormone oxytocin modulates various aspects of social behaviors and even seems to lead to a tendency for gullibility. The aim of the current study was to investigate the effect of oxytocin on lie detection. We hypothesized that people under oxytocin would be particularly susceptible to lies told by people of the opposite sex. After administration of
Michaela, Pfundmair, Wiebke, Erk, Annika, Reinelt   +2 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Verbal lie detection

2015
In this chapter, we discuss verbal lie detection and will argue that speech content can be revealing about deception. Starting with a section discussing the, in our view, myth that non-verbal behaviour would be more revealing about deception than speech, we then provide an overview of verbal lie detection tools currently used.
Vrij, Aldert, Taylor, Paul, Picornell, Isabel   +2 more
openaire   +1 more source