Results 91 to 100 of about 5,597 (125)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Lis Pendens in International Commercial Arbitration

SSRN Electronic Journal, 2015
The present paper offers a synopsis of the different scenarios that may give rise to the application of the lis pendens principle in international commercial arbitration, focusing first on parallel proceedings before a domestic court and an arbitral tribunal, and second on parallel proceedings before different arbitral tribunals; it thereby avoids a ...
openaire   +1 more source

Parallel Proceedings in Indian Arbitration Law: Invoking Lis Pendens

SSRN Electronic Journal, 2017
Prior to the 2015 amendments, the power to appoint arbitrators under section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996 in India was vested with the Chief Justice of India, or a High Court. In 2005, the Supreme Court of India re-characterized it as a judicial function, thereby, departing from the position under the UNCITRAL Model Law. While the
Harshad Pathak, Pratyush Panjwani
openaire   +1 more source

Article 17 - Lis Pendens

2016
Summary I. Rationale for the rule and comparison with analogous provisions contained in other EU regulations II. Low likelihood of courts belonging to different Member States having concurrent jurisdiction under the ESR III. Application of the traditional requirements of lis pendens as devised in earlier instruments to the specific context of ...
openaire   +1 more source

Lis Pendens. Discharge

The Virginia Law Register, 1903
openaire   +1 more source

Lis Pendens Before National and Arbitration Courts

2017
Litispendence je jednou z možností řešení problému paralelních řízení vedených před národními nebo rozhodčími soudy. Zásada litispendence stanovuje,že pravomoc náleží té instituci, u níž bylo řízení v téže věci a mezi týmiž stranami zahájeno jako první. Nicméně v mezinárodním procesním právu není toto pravidlo tak absolutní.
openaire   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy