Results 91 to 100 of about 5,657 (138)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

The Lessened Lis Pendens

SSRN Electronic Journal, 2003
This article warns attorneys to advise their clients to think twice before recording that lis pendens. Two California cases demonstrate that attempts to obtain a lis pendens may be worse than ineffective, and quite dangerous, leading to liability for attorney fees and compensatory and punitive damages.
openaire   +1 more source

Judgments, Lis Pendens, Res Judicata

Christoph Kern   +3 more
exaly   +2 more sources

Lis Pendens

2017
One of the important issues related to coordination among courts of different MSs under the Brussels II bis Regulation is the situation of concurrent proceedings. For this purpose, the provisions of Art. 19 define priority rules for circumstances in which courts of two or more MSs are seised with the parallel or dependent actions.
Vrbljanac, Danijela, Kunda, Ivana
openaire   +1 more source

Objection Lis Pendens

1975
The concurrent jurisdiction between the organs of the United Nations, as well as between either one of these organs and other international bodies or organs of member States creates, in some instances, what is traditionally called a situation of litispendence.
openaire   +1 more source

Parallel Proceedings – Lis Pendens and Concurrent Procedures

2020
The cornerstone of EU civil justice is the free circulation of judgments. To achieve that overall aim, the EU has systematically unified private international law rules. Member States afforded the EU with internal and external competence to enact a system that assures smooth recognition and enforcement. Leaning on the principle of mutual trust they aim
Župan, Mirela   +1 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Lis Alibi Pendens in International Arbitration

Arbitration: The International Journal of Arbitration, Mediation and Dispute Management, 2020
This article argues that cases of lis alibi pendens are offensive to Natural Justice, in particular to the principles of finality and that of nemo debet bis vexari pro una et eaudem causa. In no system of law is litispendence tolerated and international arbitration should be no exception.
openaire   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy