Results 1 to 10 of about 7,184 (201)

A Drop-in Replacement for LR(1) Table-Driven Parsing [PDF]

open access: diamondAdvances in Computing and Engineering, 2021
This paper presents a construction method for a deterministic one-symbol look-ahead LR parser which allows non-terminals in the parser look-ahead. This effectively relaxes the requirement of parsing the reverse of the right-most derivation of a string ...
Michael Oudshoorn
doaj   +2 more sources

On the size of parsers and LR(k)-grammars [PDF]

open access: bronzeTheoretical Computer Science, 2000
AbstractIn this paper, we consider two tradeoff results regarding the economy of description in parsing. One result is on the tradeoff between the size of a parser and its ability to detect an error early. The other result is on the tradeoff between the size of an LR(k)-grammar and the length k of the lookahead.
Hing Leung, Detlef Wotschke
openalex   +2 more sources

Notes on LR Parser Design [PDF]

open access: greenProceedings of the 15th conference on Computational linguistics -, 1996
5 pages, uuncoded, gzipped ...
Christer Samuelsson
openalex   +5 more sources

Automatic error recovery for LR parsers [PDF]

open access: bronzeCommunications of the ACM, 1978
In this paper we present a scheme for detecting and recovering from syntax errors in programs. The scheme, which is based on LR parsing, is driven by information which is directly and automatically obtainable from the information that is already present in an LR parser.
M. Dennis Mickunas, John A. Modry
openalex   +3 more sources

A Practical State Splitting Algorithm for Constructing LR-Parsers [PDF]

open access: hybridDAIMI Report Series, 1984
<p>A practical algorithm for constructing LR(k) parsers is given. The algorithm works by splitting those states in the LR(O)-machine that give rise to LALR(k)-conflicts. The algorithm takes a conflicting pair of items, say l,J in a state T, and performs a recursive backwards traversal of part of the predecessor tree of T.
Bent Bruun Kristensen   +1 more
openalex   +4 more sources

Validating LR(1) Parsers [PDF]

open access: bronze, 2012
An LR(1) parser is a finite-state automaton, equipped with a stack, which uses a combination of its current state and one lookahead symbol in order to determine which action to perform next. We present a validator which, when applied to a context-free grammar G and an automaton A, checks that A and G agree.
Jacques-Henri Jourdan   +2 more
openalex   +3 more sources

Disambiguation Filters for Scannerless Generalized LR Parsers [PDF]

open access: bronze, 2002
In this paper we present the fusion of generalized LR parsing and scannerless parsing. This combination supports syntax de.nitions in which all aspects (lexical and context-free) of the syntax of a language are de.ned explicitly in one formalism. Furthermore, there are no restrictions on the class of grammars, thus allowing a natural syntax tree ...
Mark van den Brand   +3 more
openalex   +9 more sources

Repairing syntax errors in LR parsers [PDF]

open access: bronzeACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, 2002
This article reports on an error-repair algorithm for LR parsers. It locally inserts, deletes or shifts symbols at the positions where errors are detected, thus modifying the right context in order to resume parsing on a valid piece of input. This method improves on others in that it does not require the user to provide additional information about the
Rafael Corchuelo   +3 more
openalex   +5 more sources

Reachability and error diagnosis in LR(1) parsers [PDF]

open access: greenProceedings of the 25th International Conference on Compiler Construction, 2016
Given an LR(1) automaton, what are the states in which an error can be detected? For each such " error state " , what is a minimal input sentence that causes an error in this state? We propose an algorithm that answers these questions. This allows building a collection of pairs of an erroneous input sentence and a (handwritten) diagnostic message ...
François Pottier
openalex   +5 more sources

Are LR parsers too powerful?

open access: bronzeACM SIGPLAN Notices, 1986
The general trend in the development of parser theory is in the direction of exploring implementing methods of increasing power. In particular, ways of improving the efficiency of LR parsers and the generation of LR tables have been receiving a lot of attention.
Philip Machanick
openalex   +3 more sources

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy