Results 261 to 270 of about 1,822,465 (296)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
2021
In the literature, the Fibonacci numbers are usually denoted by \(F_n\), but this symbol is already reserved for the Fermat numbers in this book. So we will denote them by \(K_n\). The sequence of Fibonacci numbers \(\,\,(K_n)_{n=0}^\infty \,\,\) starts with \(K_0=0\) and \(K_1=1\) and satisfies the recurrence.
Michal Křížek +2 more
openaire +1 more source
In the literature, the Fibonacci numbers are usually denoted by \(F_n\), but this symbol is already reserved for the Fermat numbers in this book. So we will denote them by \(K_n\). The sequence of Fibonacci numbers \(\,\,(K_n)_{n=0}^\infty \,\,\) starts with \(K_0=0\) and \(K_1=1\) and satisfies the recurrence.
Michal Křížek +2 more
openaire +1 more source
Perfect fibonacci and lucas numbers
Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico di Palermo, 2000Using elementary means, the author shows that no Fibonacci or Lucas number is perfect.
openaire +2 more sources
Journal of Philosophical Logic, 1982
Discussion de l'argumentation de J. R. Lucas suivant laquelle les etres humains ne peuvent etre des machines ("Minds, Machines and Godel", Philosophy, 36, 1961, p. 120-124). L'A. montre que l'argument de Lucas suivant lequel il n'est pas une machine repose sur une premisse erronee: suivant l'A., Lucas est donc lui-meme une machine.
openaire +1 more source
Discussion de l'argumentation de J. R. Lucas suivant laquelle les etres humains ne peuvent etre des machines ("Minds, Machines and Godel", Philosophy, 36, 1961, p. 120-124). L'A. montre que l'argument de Lucas suivant lequel il n'est pas une machine repose sur une premisse erronee: suivant l'A., Lucas est donc lui-meme une machine.
openaire +1 more source
Trisection method by k-Lucas numbers
Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2008zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
openaire +4 more sources
Mersenne numbers as a difference of two Lucas numbers
Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae, 2023Summary: Let \((L_n)_{n\geq 0}\) be the Lucas sequence. We show that the Diophantine equation \(L_n-L_m=M_k\) has only the nonnegative integer solutions \((n,m,k)=(2,0,1)\), \((3,1,2)\), \((3,2,1)\), \((4,3,2)\), \((5,3,3)\), \((6,2,4)\), \((6,5,3)\) where \(M_k=2^k-1\) is the \(k\)th Mersenne number and \(n>m\).
openaire +3 more sources
Coding theory on Lucas p numbers
Discrete Mathematics, Algorithms and Applications, 2016In [K. Kuhapatanakul, The Lucas [Formula: see text]-matrix, Internat. J. Math. Ed. Sci. Tech. (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2015.1026612], Kuhapatanakul introduced Lucas [Formula: see text] matrix, [Formula: see text] whose elements are Lucas [Formula: see text] numbers. In this paper, we developed a new coding and decoding method followed
openaire +3 more sources
1997
Consider the following number trick–try it out on your friends. You ask them to write down the numbers from 0 to 9. Against 0 and 1 they write any two numbers (we suggest two fairly small positive integers just to avoid tedious arithmetic, but all participants should write the same pair of numbers).
Peter Hilton +2 more
openaire +1 more source
Consider the following number trick–try it out on your friends. You ask them to write down the numbers from 0 to 9. Against 0 and 1 they write any two numbers (we suggest two fairly small positive integers just to avoid tedious arithmetic, but all participants should write the same pair of numbers).
Peter Hilton +2 more
openaire +1 more source
1991
In the paper [3], we have proved that the only triangular numbers (i.e., the positive integers of the form \( \frac{1}{2}m \)(m+1)) in the Fibonacci sequence $$ {u_n} + 2 = {u_{n + 1}} + {u_{{n^,}}}{u_0} = 0, {u_1} = 1 $$ are u ±1=u2=1, u4=3, u8=21 and u10=55. This verifies a conjecture of Vern Hoggatt [2].
openaire +1 more source
In the paper [3], we have proved that the only triangular numbers (i.e., the positive integers of the form \( \frac{1}{2}m \)(m+1)) in the Fibonacci sequence $$ {u_n} + 2 = {u_{n + 1}} + {u_{{n^,}}}{u_0} = 0, {u_1} = 1 $$ are u ±1=u2=1, u4=3, u8=21 and u10=55. This verifies a conjecture of Vern Hoggatt [2].
openaire +1 more source
Lucas-Sierpiński and Lucas-Riesel Numbers
The Fibonacci Quarterly, 2011Daniel Baczkowski +2 more
openaire +1 more source