Results 261 to 270 of about 35,208 (291)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Coding theory on Lucas p numbers
Discrete Mathematics, Algorithms and Applications, 2016In [K. Kuhapatanakul, The Lucas [Formula: see text]-matrix, Internat. J. Math. Ed. Sci. Tech. (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2015.1026612], Kuhapatanakul introduced Lucas [Formula: see text] matrix, [Formula: see text] whose elements are Lucas [Formula: see text] numbers. In this paper, we developed a new coding and decoding method followed
openaire +2 more sources
Mersenne numbers as a difference of two Lucas numbers
Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae, 2023Summary: Let \((L_n)_{n\geq 0}\) be the Lucas sequence. We show that the Diophantine equation \(L_n-L_m=M_k\) has only the nonnegative integer solutions \((n,m,k)=(2,0,1)\), \((3,1,2)\), \((3,2,1)\), \((4,3,2)\), \((5,3,3)\), \((6,2,4)\), \((6,5,3)\) where \(M_k=2^k-1\) is the \(k\)th Mersenne number and \(n>m\).
openaire +3 more sources
Trisection method by k-Lucas numbers
Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2008zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
openaire +3 more sources
1997
Consider the following number trick–try it out on your friends. You ask them to write down the numbers from 0 to 9. Against 0 and 1 they write any two numbers (we suggest two fairly small positive integers just to avoid tedious arithmetic, but all participants should write the same pair of numbers).
Peter Hilton +2 more
openaire +1 more source
Consider the following number trick–try it out on your friends. You ask them to write down the numbers from 0 to 9. Against 0 and 1 they write any two numbers (we suggest two fairly small positive integers just to avoid tedious arithmetic, but all participants should write the same pair of numbers).
Peter Hilton +2 more
openaire +1 more source
Lucas-Sierpiński and Lucas-Riesel Numbers
The Fibonacci Quarterly, 2011Daniel Baczkowski +2 more
openaire +1 more source
1991
In the paper [3], we have proved that the only triangular numbers (i.e., the positive integers of the form \( \frac{1}{2}m \)(m+1)) in the Fibonacci sequence $$ {u_n} + 2 = {u_{n + 1}} + {u_{{n^,}}}{u_0} = 0, {u_1} = 1 $$ are u ±1=u2=1, u4=3, u8=21 and u10=55. This verifies a conjecture of Vern Hoggatt [2].
openaire +1 more source
In the paper [3], we have proved that the only triangular numbers (i.e., the positive integers of the form \( \frac{1}{2}m \)(m+1)) in the Fibonacci sequence $$ {u_n} + 2 = {u_{n + 1}} + {u_{{n^,}}}{u_0} = 0, {u_1} = 1 $$ are u ±1=u2=1, u4=3, u8=21 and u10=55. This verifies a conjecture of Vern Hoggatt [2].
openaire +1 more source
Pseudoprimality related to the generalized Lucas sequences
Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 2022Dorin Andrica, Ovidiu Bagdasar
exaly
On Some New Arithmetic Properties of the Generalized Lucas Sequences
Mediterranean Journal of Mathematics, 2021Dorin Andrica +2 more
exaly