Results 271 to 280 of about 53,615 (314)

Maximum-Corrected and Chance-Corrected Measures of Effect Size for the Mantel–Haenszel Test

Psychological Reports, 2010
Two measures of effect size are described for the Mantel–Haenszel test. Both measures belong to the r-family of effect size measures. One measure is based on a maximum-corrected model, and the second measure is based on a chance-corrected model.
Kenneth J, Berry, Janis E, Johnston, Paul W, Mielke   +2 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Detecting Potentially Biased Test Items: Comparison of IRT Area and Mantel-Haenszel Methods

Applied Measurement in Education, 1989
The purpose of this study was to compare the IRT-based area method and the Mantel-Haenszel method for investigating differential item functioning (DIF), to determine the degree of agreement between the methods in identifying potentially biased items, and, when the two methods led to different results, to identify possible reasons for the discrepancies.
Ronald K. Hambleton, H. Jane Rogers
openaire   +1 more source

Comparison of the Mantel-Haenszel Test with a Randomized and a Jackknife Test for Detecting Biased Items

Journal of Educational Statistics, 1990
The Mantel-Haenszel (MH) chi-square test has been shown to have desirable statistical properties in detecting biased items. However, small sample sizes are still of concern, especially when large differences in ability exist between the focal and reference groups.
Gregory Camilli, Jeffrey K. Smith
openaire   +1 more source

Erweiterung des Mantel‐Haenszel‐Tests auf K(>2) Gruppen

Biometrical Journal, 1984
AbstractThe Mantel‐Haenszel‐Test, which is widely used as the so called logrank‐test for survival data, was developed for two groups with ordinally scaled data. It is shown that it can be applied to more than two groups, and that the test statistic is easily derived from the F‐statistics of standard oneway analysis of variance procedures.
openaire   +1 more source

Chi-Square Tests with One Degree of Freedom; Extensions of the Mantel- Haenszel Procedure

Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1963
Abstract A published method for analyzing multiple 2×2 contingency tables arising in retrospective studies of disease is extended in application and form. Extensions of application include comparisons of age-adjusted death rates, life-table analyses, comparisons of two sets of quantal dosage-response data, and miscellaneous laboratory applications as ...
openaire   +1 more source

Integrative oncology: Addressing the global challenges of cancer prevention and treatment

Ca-A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2022
Jun J Mao,, Msce, Lorenzo Cohen, Karen M Mustian   +2 more
exaly  

An Introduction to Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel Testing and Nonparametric ANOVA

2023
J.C.W. Rayner, G. C. Livingston Jr
openaire   +1 more source

Mantel-Haenszel Test

2018
openaire   +1 more source

Obesity and adverse breast cancer risk and outcome: Mechanistic insights and strategies for intervention

Ca-A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2017
Cynthia Morata-Tarifa, Joyce M Slingerland   +1 more
exaly  

Multidisciplinary standards of care and recent progress in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Ca-A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2020
Aaron J Grossberg, William L Hwang, Anirban Maitra   +2 more
exaly