Results 241 to 250 of about 4,386,144 (303)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Global Human Rights Sanctions: How Can They Contribute to Addressing Mass Atrocities?

Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal
Global Human Rights Sanctions (GHRS) have been used in over 30 countries as a mechanism for imposing unilateral human rights sanctions on individual perpetrators. Despite the hundreds of specific sanctions that have been imposed globally, there remains a
Yifan Jia
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Assessing Indonesia’s Capacity for Preventing Mass Atrocities

, 2020
With the pervasive violations of human rights, including mass atrocities, which happened during the authoritarian New Order administration, the literature on human rights in Indonesia has often been highly critical of the regimes’ human rights record ...
R. Nurhayati
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Accountability after Mass Atrocities

Journal for Peace and Justice Studies, 2022
The pursuit of accountability for perpetrators of mass violence is a significant aspect of peace negotiations. However, different groups often hold conflicting views on what justice means to them. While scholars increasingly discuss the contested nature of transitional justice processes, accountability continues to be seen as a relatively objective ...
openaire   +1 more source

Breaking the Cycle of Mass Atrocities

2019
M. Aksenova   +2 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Section 230 and the Duty to Prevent Mass Atrocities

, 2020
Between August and November, 2017, the Myanmar military carried out a series of brutal attacks against Rohingya Muslim communities in Rakhine State in Myanmar. Myanmar’s military used Facebook as a tool for ethnic cleansing.
D. Sloss
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Norms and Mass Atrocities

2018
This chapter argues that norms, particularly weak regulative norms such as R2P, have limited influence in cases where actors consider that violating the norm is a matter of existential necessity. States always contend with a plurality and hierarchy of norms, which is itself subject to often sudden fluctuations.
openaire   +1 more source

Trying Tyrants for Mass Atrocity

Alternative Law Journal, 2009
A n extraordinary focus on the criminal responsibility of leaders for mass atrocity has developed since the tentative revival of international criminal law in the early 1990s. Ironically, it was images of emaciated concentration camp detainees in Bosnia reminiscent of Auschwitz — and in Europe’s backyard — that prompted the creation of the first ...
openaire   +1 more source

Making Sense of Mass Atrocity

2009
Genocide, crimes against humanity, and the worst war crimes are possible only when the state or other organisations mobilise and co-ordinate the efforts of many people. Responsibility for mass atrocity is always widely shared, often by thousands. Yet criminal law, with its liberal underpinnings, prefers to blame particular individuals for isolated acts.
openaire   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy