Results 221 to 230 of about 28,677 (268)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
2018
This chapter argues that norms, particularly weak regulative norms such as R2P, have limited influence in cases where actors consider that violating the norm is a matter of existential necessity. States always contend with a plurality and hierarchy of norms, which is itself subject to often sudden fluctuations.
openaire +1 more source
This chapter argues that norms, particularly weak regulative norms such as R2P, have limited influence in cases where actors consider that violating the norm is a matter of existential necessity. States always contend with a plurality and hierarchy of norms, which is itself subject to often sudden fluctuations.
openaire +1 more source
Trying Tyrants for Mass Atrocity
Alternative Law Journal, 2009A n extraordinary focus on the criminal responsibility of leaders for mass atrocity has developed since the tentative revival of international criminal law in the early 1990s. Ironically, it was images of emaciated concentration camp detainees in Bosnia reminiscent of Auschwitz — and in Europe’s backyard — that prompted the creation of the first ...
openaire +1 more source
2009
Genocide, crimes against humanity, and the worst war crimes are possible only when the state or other organisations mobilise and co-ordinate the efforts of many people. Responsibility for mass atrocity is always widely shared, often by thousands. Yet criminal law, with its liberal underpinnings, prefers to blame particular individuals for isolated acts.
openaire +1 more source
Genocide, crimes against humanity, and the worst war crimes are possible only when the state or other organisations mobilise and co-ordinate the efforts of many people. Responsibility for mass atrocity is always widely shared, often by thousands. Yet criminal law, with its liberal underpinnings, prefers to blame particular individuals for isolated acts.
openaire +1 more source
Complexity of Accountability for Mass Atrocity
2014Over the past two decades, a new international regime of individual criminal accountability has emerged as a dominant regulatory mechanism to address gross human rights violations. At the same time, states are still pursuing claims against each other for human rights abuses in front of international courts.
openaire +1 more source
Genocide, Mass Atrocity, and Theories of Crime: Unlocking Criminology's Potential
Annual Review of Criminology, 2021Susanne Karstedt +2 more
exaly
Atrocity denial and emotions in the Ethiopian civil war
Aggression and Violent Behavior, 2023Yilma Woldgabreal
exaly
Cultural Heritage and Mass Atrocities
The Historic Environment: Policy & Practice, 2023openaire +2 more sources
Contextualizing mass atrocity crimes: The dynamics of ‘extremely violent societies’
European Journal of Criminology, 2012Susanne Karstedt
exaly