Results 61 to 70 of about 194 (158)
John J. Mearsheimer y Sebastian Rosato, How States Think: The Rationality of Foreign Policy, New Haven, Yale University Press, 2023, 304 pp. Dominique Colas, Poutine, l’Ukraine et les statues de Lénine, París, Presses de Sciences Po, 2023, 144 pp ...
Revista Foro Internacional
doaj
European Defence and NATO: From Competition to Co‐operation to Replacement?
JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, Volume 63, Issue S1, Page 156-168, November 2025.
Jolyon Howorth
wiley +1 more source
A Second Cold War? Explaining Changes in the American Discourse on China: Evidence from the Presidential Debates (1960-2020). [PDF]
Marandici I.
europepmc +1 more source
Testing the world order: strategic realism in Russian foreign affairs. [PDF]
Feinstein SG, Pirro EB.
europepmc +1 more source
Brexit, the Rise of China, and the Future of the Liberal International Order and Great Power Competition. [PDF]
de Paiva Pires S.
europepmc +1 more source
Realism between science and ideology
Sovereignty is defined as the external behaviour of a state personalized by its elite after gaining the consensus of the public. Seldom between decision making and public approval there are many intermediate actors such as lobbies and group interest.
Șerban Filip Cioculescu, Silviu Petre
doaj
Through thick and thin: Russia, China and the future of Eurasian International Society. [PDF]
Paikin Z.
europepmc +1 more source
پوختە ڕۆژهەڵاتی ئاسیا ئەو ناوچەیەیە، کە بۆ ویلایەتە یەکگرتووەکانی ئەمریکا پێگەیەیکی ستراتیژی گرینگی هەیە، بۆیە بۆ هیچ ئەکتەرێکی تر نییە، هەژموونی خۆی بەسەر ئەو ناوچەیە بسەپێنێ و دواجار ببێ بە مایەی هەڕەشە بۆ سەر بەرژەوەندییە باڵاکانی ئەمریکا.
Chenar Babaker Mohammed
doaj +1 more source
What is Wrong with Mearsheimer’s Offensive Realism?
Abstract The present paper calls into question one of the most prominent International Relations theories: John J. Mearsheimer’s offensive realism. By bringing to bear the conceptual apparatus of Austrian- and public-choice-style political economy, the article demonstrates Mearsheimer’s conception to be either substantively unsound or
openaire +1 more source

