Results 161 to 170 of about 352,757 (205)
Entropy-Based Patent Valuation: Decoding "Costly Signals" in the Food Industry via a Robust Entropy-TOPSIS Framework. [PDF]
Li X, Liu W, Liang X, Zhou A.
europepmc +1 more source
Individual identifiability following Procrustes alignment of functional gradients: effect of subspace dimensionality. [PDF]
Sasse L +5 more
europepmc +1 more source
Editorial: Deep learning for high-dimensional sense, non-linear signal processing and intelligent diagnosis, vol II. [PDF]
Ke H, Cai C, Yao L, Chen D.
europepmc +1 more source
A defect recognition method based on ITLPP and multi-feature fusion matrix. [PDF]
Lei B, Yi P.
europepmc +1 more source
Rewilding: history, intervention and the quest for immanence. [PDF]
Valverde Pérez N, Castro García Ò.
europepmc +1 more source
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
Commuting measure-preserving transformations
Israel Journal of Mathematics, 1972Let φ1, ... ,φd be commuting measure-preserving transformations, \( \phi ^l \equiv \phi _1^{l_1 } \phi _2^{l_2 } \cdot \cdot \cdot \phi _d^{l_d } ,\Phi = \left\{ {\phi ^l } \right\} \). The Kakutani-Rokhlin tower theorem is proved in a refined form for non-periodic groups Φ, and the Shannon-McMillan theorem is extended to ergodic groups.
Katznelson, Yitzhak, Weiss, Benjamin
openaire +1 more source
Conjugates of Infinite Measure Preserving Transformations
Canadian Journal of Mathematics, 1988In this paper we consider a question concerning the conjugacy class of an arbitrary ergodic automorphism σ of a sigma finite Lebesgue space (X, , μ) (i.e., a is a ju-preserving bimeasurable bijection of (X, , μ). Specifically we proveTHEOREM 1. Let τ, σ be any pair of ergodic automorphisms of an infinite sigma finite Lebesgue space (X, , μ).
Alpern, S., Choksi, J. R., Prasad, V. S.
openaire +2 more sources
Jointly ergodic measure-preserving transformations
Israel Journal of Mathematics, 1984The notion of ergodicity of a measure preserving transformation is generalized to finite sets of transformations. The main result is that, if \(T_ 1,T_ 2,...,T_ s\) are invertible commuting measure preserving transformations, of a probability space (X,\({\mathcal B},\mu)\), then \[ \frac{1}{N-M}\sum^{N-1}_{n=M}T^ n_ 1f_ 1\cdot T^ n_ 2f_ 2\cdot...\cdot ...
Berend, Daniel, Bergelson, Vitaly
openaire +1 more source

