Cost-effectiveness analysis of bridge-to-transplantation temporary mechanical circulatory support versus non-bridged heart transplantation. [PDF]
Yin L +17 more
europepmc +1 more source
Device-Related Adverse Events and Outcomes in Patients With Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support Placed at Referral Centers Versus Cardiogenic Shock Hub Centers: An Observational Analysis. [PDF]
Patel ZA +20 more
europepmc +1 more source
Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Acute Myocardial Infarction Cardiogenic Shock. [PDF]
Erdem S, Patel DA, Zeid KA, Aoun J.
europepmc +1 more source
Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Cardiogenic Shock: A Narrative Review in Light of Recent Evidence. [PDF]
Paragliola V +9 more
europepmc +1 more source
A Deep Learning Model to Guide Personalized Mechanical Circulatory Support Use in Cardiogenic Shock Patients Undergoing PCI. [PDF]
Amin AP +6 more
europepmc +1 more source
Cardiogenic shock in cancer: differences in use of temporary mechanical circulatory support, invasive hemodynamic assessment and patient outcomes. [PDF]
Diaz Saravia S +10 more
europepmc +1 more source
Mechanical Circulatory Support in Women [PDF]
A number of devices can now provide mechanical circulatory support (MCS) to patients with acute cardiogenic shock (CS) and chronic end-stage heart failure (HF). Women differ from men in pathophysiology and natural history of CS and HF, and are usually sicker at admission.
Sandeep Dayanand, Vincent M Figueredo
exaly +3 more sources
Related searches:
Mechanical Circulatory Support
Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America, 2014The role for temporary and durable mechanical circulatory support is rapidly expanding. As the use of these technologies continues to grow, the emergency physician has an increasing opportunity to participate in the advancement of these potentially life-saving technologies.
John C, Greenwood, Daniel L, Herr
openaire +2 more sources

