Results 141 to 150 of about 56,499 (196)

Cost-effectiveness analysis of bridge-to-transplantation temporary mechanical circulatory support versus non-bridged heart transplantation. [PDF]

open access: yesFront Public Health
Yin L   +17 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Device-Related Adverse Events and Outcomes in Patients With Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support Placed at Referral Centers Versus Cardiogenic Shock Hub Centers: An Observational Analysis. [PDF]

open access: yesCirc Heart Fail
Patel ZA   +20 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Cardiogenic Shock: A Narrative Review in Light of Recent Evidence. [PDF]

open access: yesJ Clin Med
Paragliola V   +9 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Cardiogenic shock in cancer: differences in use of temporary mechanical circulatory support, invasive hemodynamic assessment and patient outcomes. [PDF]

open access: yesCardiooncology
Diaz Saravia S   +10 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Acute circulatory support system

open access: yes
Candelario, K.   +2 more
core  

Mechanical Circulatory Support in Women [PDF]

open access: yesJournal of Cardiology, 2021
A number of devices can now provide mechanical circulatory support (MCS) to patients with acute cardiogenic shock (CS) and chronic end-stage heart failure (HF). Women differ from men in pathophysiology and natural history of CS and HF, and are usually sicker at admission.
Sandeep Dayanand, Vincent M Figueredo
exaly   +3 more sources

Mechanical Circulatory Support

Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America, 2014
The role for temporary and durable mechanical circulatory support is rapidly expanding. As the use of these technologies continues to grow, the emergency physician has an increasing opportunity to participate in the advancement of these potentially life-saving technologies.
John C, Greenwood, Daniel L, Herr
openaire   +2 more sources

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy