Results 91 to 100 of about 2,024 (137)
The Deterrent Effects of Ethics Codes for Corporate Crime: A Meta-Analysis
Natalie Schell‐Busey
openalex +1 more source
Research ethics : towards a meta-code for protocol evaluation systems?
Edward Van Rossen
openalex +1 more source
Ethics in Service-Learning (S-L): A meta-analysis from Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)
Héctor Opazo Carvajal +3 more
openalex +1 more source
Meta-Ethics and AI: Exploring the Novel Meta-Ethical Questions in the Era of AI
Shang Lu
openalex +1 more source
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
Business Meta-Ethics: An Analysis of Two Theories
Business Ethics Quarterly, 1995Abstract:The main purpose of this paper is to defend traditional ethical theory (utilitarianism and deontology) for its application in business against a more recent model consisting of utility, rights, and justice. This is done in three parts: First, we provide a conceptual argument for the superiority of the traditional model; second, we demonstrate ...
F. Neil Brady, Craig P. Dunn
openaire +1 more source
Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 1980
Meta-ethics without normative ethics is empty. In the current climate this hardly needs emphasis: since 1960 or so philosophers in the English-speaking world have put away their earlier reluctance to think about substantive moral issues. For a while, in fact, it seemed that normative ethics would completely dominate the scene in the way metaethics once
openaire +1 more source
Meta-ethics without normative ethics is empty. In the current climate this hardly needs emphasis: since 1960 or so philosophers in the English-speaking world have put away their earlier reluctance to think about substantive moral issues. For a while, in fact, it seemed that normative ethics would completely dominate the scene in the way metaethics once
openaire +1 more source
2020
Abstract Moore’s arguments begin a debate that revives sentimentalist and rationalist arguments. According to Moore, ‘good’ is indefinable, because there is no definition of it that mentions only ‘natural’ properties. Non-naturalist objectivists argue that we know about objective moral properties, but not in the way we know about other ...
openaire +1 more source
Abstract Moore’s arguments begin a debate that revives sentimentalist and rationalist arguments. According to Moore, ‘good’ is indefinable, because there is no definition of it that mentions only ‘natural’ properties. Non-naturalist objectivists argue that we know about objective moral properties, but not in the way we know about other ...
openaire +1 more source
The meta-ethical grounding of our moral beliefs: Evidence for meta-ethical pluralism
Philosophical Psychology, 2013Recent scholarship (Goodwin & Darley, 2008) on the meta-ethical debate between objectivism and relativism has found people to be mixed: they are objectivists about some issues, but relativists about others. The studies discussed here sought to explore this further.
Jennifer C. Wright +2 more
openaire +1 more source
The Journal of Men's Health & Gender, 2004
Abstract There are four main traditions that inform our current consensus statements on medical ethics. These are the virtue ethics of ancient Greece, the Judaeo-Christian tradition, deontology and utilitarianism. Feminist writers see all four of these traditions as stemming from a specifically masculine conception of human identity. Feminist writers
openaire +1 more source
Abstract There are four main traditions that inform our current consensus statements on medical ethics. These are the virtue ethics of ancient Greece, the Judaeo-Christian tradition, deontology and utilitarianism. Feminist writers see all four of these traditions as stemming from a specifically masculine conception of human identity. Feminist writers
openaire +1 more source
Acta Analytica, 2008
The author takes up three metaphysical conceptions of morality — realism, projectivism, constructivism — and the account of justification or reason that makes these pictures possible. It is argued that the right meta-ethical conception should be the one that entails the most plausible conception of reason-giving, rather than by any other consideration.
openaire +1 more source
The author takes up three metaphysical conceptions of morality — realism, projectivism, constructivism — and the account of justification or reason that makes these pictures possible. It is argued that the right meta-ethical conception should be the one that entails the most plausible conception of reason-giving, rather than by any other consideration.
openaire +1 more source

