Results 111 to 120 of about 1,488 (141)

Metodo de Muskingum-Cunge análisis de sensibilidad y limites de aplicacion

, 1995
openaire   +1 more source

Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Related searches:

Analytical verification of Muskingum-Cunge routing

Journal of Hydrology, 1996
Abstract A verification of Muskingum-Cunge routing is accomplished by comparing theoretically calculated peak outflow and travel time with those generated using the constant-parameter Muskingum-Cunge method of flood routing. The close agreement between analytical and numerical results underscores the utility of Muskingum-Cunge routing as a viable and
Anil Lohani
exaly   +2 more sources

Variable-parameter Muskingum-Cunge method revisited

Journal of Hydrology, 1994
This paper re-examines the variable-parameter Muskingum-Cunge method. Numerical experiments show that the loss of mass is small but perceptible throughout the wide range of peak inflows tested, from 200 to 1000 cfs ft−1 (18.58–92.9 m2 s−1). Modified three-point direct and four-point iterative variable-parameter methods are introduced.
V.M. Ponce, P.V. Changanti
exaly   +2 more sources

Modeling Looped Ratings in Muskingum-Cunge Routing

Journal of Hydrologic Engineering - ASCE, 2001
The Muskingum-Cunge flood routing model is extended to the realm of looped ratings. This is accomplished by reformulating the conventional four-point model to use the local water surface slope and the Vedernikov number in the expression for hydraulic diffusivity.
Victor M. Ponce, Adolph Lugo
exaly   +2 more sources

Volume Conservation in Variable Parameter Muskingum-Cunge Method

Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 1999
The simple Variable Parameter Muskingum-Cunge (VPMC) method is still frequently used for flood routing. However, difficulties arise in the selection of an appropriate “reference” discharge for evaluating the routing parameters and in the small volume loss that can occur. Several commonly used schemes for the VPMC method are compared through a series of
Xiao-Nan Tang, Donald W. Knight, Paul G. Samuels   +2 more
exaly   +2 more sources

Volume Conservation Controversy of the Variable Parameter Muskingum–Cunge Method

Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2008
The study analyzes the volume conservation problem of the variable parameter Muskingum-Cunge VPMC method for which some remedial solutions have been advocated in recent literature. The limitation of the VPMC method to conserve volume is brought out by conducting a total of 6,400 routing experiments.
Muthiah Perumal, Bhabagrahi Sahoo
exaly   +2 more sources

On the negative weighting factors in the Muskingum-Cunge scheme

Journal of Hydraulic Research/De Recherches Hydrauliques, 2000
The Muskingum-Cunge scheme applied to the one-dimensional unsteady advection-diffusion equation is investigated. To eliminate the numerical diffusion, the coefficients of the scheme are defined in such a way that the scheme does not contain the weighting parameters explicitly, but the Courant and Peclet numbers only.
Sandor Szél, Csaba Gáspár
exaly   +2 more sources

Variable parameter Muskingum-Cunge method for flood routing in a compound channel

Journal of Hydraulic Research/De Recherches Hydrauliques, 1999
(1999). Variable parameter Muskingum-Cunge method for flood routing in a compound channel. Journal of Hydraulic Research: Vol. 37, No. 5, pp. 591-614.
Xiaonan Tang
exaly   +2 more sources

On the impact of journal papers: The Muskingum-Cunge flood-routing method

Journal of Hydraulic Research/De Recherches Hydrauliques, 2003
(2003). On the impact of journal papers: The Muskingum-Cunge flood-routing method. Journal of Hydraulic Research: Vol. 41, No. 6, pp. 563-563.
Marcelo H Garcia
exaly   +2 more sources

Flood routing using the Muskingum-Cunge method and application of different routing parameters

Sadhana - Academy Proceedings in Engineering Sciences, 2022
Hadi Norouzi
exaly   +2 more sources