Results 181 to 190 of about 59,112 (279)
In the aftermath of the 2020 U.S. election, the boundary between activism and extremism blurred, with election officials reporting violent threats and false accusations of election fraud. From a symbolic interactionist perspective, these attacks provide a unique lens for examining the consequences of being falsely labeled a criminal.
Steven Windisch
wiley +1 more source
Decoding Disbelief: Using Natural Language Processing's Sentiment Analysis to Assess 24 Years of Unfounded Rape Reports Narratives. [PDF]
Lovell RE, Caporale L, Du J.
europepmc +1 more source
Dangerous Deference: What the British Public Think about Civil‐Military Relations
Abstract Accepted norms of democratic civil‐military relations aver, regarding the use of force, that military officers may not substitute civilians’ judgement with their own and that civilians should not follow their guidance blindly. These theories often rest on the presumption that three critical actors—government, armed forces, and the public ...
David Blagden +2 more
wiley +1 more source
Spectral interlocutions and the politics of unfinished: Buddhism, haunting, and memory in Karunatilaka's <i>The Seven Moons of Maali Almeida</i>. [PDF]
Humphry NM, I A.
europepmc +1 more source
ABSTRACT The article examines post‐Stalinist Soviet expertise on girls’ education and upbringing, analysing texts for and about female adolescents created by specialists in pedagogical sciences, psychology, sociology, medicine as well as children's writers and journalists from different parts of the Union, including national republics. The text focuses
Ella Rossman
wiley +1 more source
A multicomponent, place-based approach to improving men's health and well-being in disadvantaged areas: a qualitative study. [PDF]
Visram S +11 more
europepmc +1 more source
Anticipation and prevention of real risks of virtual environments in psychiatry. [PDF]
Marloth M +6 more
europepmc +1 more source
What is social science if not critical?
Abstract This short article represents a contribution to the debate on the motion “Social science is explanation, or it is nothing.” While in the format of parliamentary debating the contribution would fall on the side of the opposition, I will not be arguing against explanation as such.
Jana Bacevic
wiley +1 more source

