Results 151 to 160 of about 15,505 (200)

Parental Liability and the Principle of Ne Bis In Idem

2023
Abstract This chapter analyses the application of the principle of ne bis in idem (double jeopardy) in the context of parental liability for EU antitrust violations. First, it outlines briefly some essential detail on the principle itself, thereby providing the legal content to be relied upon in the chapter’s substantive analyses.
openaire   +3 more sources

The Long Road to a Unified Test for the European Ne Bis In Idem Principle

European Public Law, 2022
Although the significance of the ne bis in idem principle is undisputed, it has proven difficult to apply it consistently over the years. In the EU, the Court of Justice (CJEU) case law has long diverged according to the field of law. Notably, since Aalborg Portland and Toshiba an antitrust-specific threefold condition of idem (same person,
Colangelo Giuseppe, Cappai Marco
openaire   +2 more sources

Hungarian national report on the principle of ne bis in idem

Revue internationale de droit pénal, 2002
Dans les groupes d’adolescents, l’apport d’un reve se presente comme un reve dans le reve. Il se manifeste quand le cadre est mis en danger. L’auteur avance l’hypothese que dans les groupes d’adolescents, les reves tentent de consolider les enveloppes groupales par renforcement de la differenciation entre l’interieur et l’exterieur du groupe...
Balázs Gellér, Norbert Kis, Péter Polt   +2 more
openaire   +1 more source

The Principle of Ne Bis in Idem

Intertax, 2018
In the A. and B. v. Norway case decided by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) on 15 November 2016 (24130/11 and 29758/11), the principle of ne bis in idem suffered a significant blow. Via the Luca Menci (C-524/15), Garlsson Real Estate (C-537/16) and Di Puma (C-596/16 and C-597/16) cases, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) was confronted with ...
Baron, J., Poelmann, E.
openaire   +1 more source