Results 131 to 140 of about 69,756 (259)
Iatrogenic Nerve Injuries Affecting Upper Limb Function: Medicolegal Implications. [PDF]
Vasdeki D +5 more
europepmc +1 more source
Gender and Obstetric Violence in Britain, ca. 1750–1830
ABSTRACT Obstetric violence is a form of gendered violence experienced by pregnant and birthing people, particularly women, during medical care provided in the hospital, clinic or home. Recent scholarship has explored how obstetric violence and obstetric racism manifested historically, from post‐war Canada to colonial and postcolonial Mexico.
Paige Donaghy
wiley +1 more source
This case note critically examines the January 2026 High Court judgment in The King (on the application of The Howard League for Penal Reform) v The Secretary of State for Justice which dismissed a judicial review challenging the expansion of the use of PAVA spray in Young Offender Institutions (YOIs) in England.
Raymond Arthur
wiley +1 more source
Care and COVID 19: Lessons for liberals and neoliberals
Abstract Within the liberal political traditions, care is regarded as a private matter, a problem of ethics rather than justice. Social justice is framed as an issue of economics (re/distribution), culture (recognition) and/or politics (representation).
Kathleen Lynch
wiley +1 more source
Litigation as an Underutilised Quality Feedback Indicator: A Review of Court Cases in a Small Resource-Limited Country. [PDF]
Bahall M, Bahall K.
europepmc +1 more source
Serious harm in healthcare often results from systemic failures, yet criminal accountability remains largely addressed through homicide law, gross negligence manslaughter and health‐and‐safety offences, frameworks that emphasise individual culpability and are ill‐suited to addressing organisational failings.
Sarah Bennett, Amel Alghrani
wiley +1 more source
The Relevance of Law and Economics for Fire Safety. [PDF]
Korsten R, Franchini A, Van Coile R.
europepmc +1 more source
X v The Lord Advocate: Challenges and Concerns for Vicarious Liability
In X v The Lord Advocate, the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom held that the Crown cannot be vicariously liable for torts committed by judges. This case note critically examines what could be viewed as two significant doctrinal shifts that were introduced by this ruling.
Haim Abraham
wiley +1 more source

