Results 161 to 170 of about 10,187 (226)
, 2007 Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
1998
AbstractNeoplatonism is traditionally considered a mystical philosophy; on the contrary the aim of this book is to show the importance of a logical and epistemological approach for the understanding of Neoplatonic basic ontological problems. In doing that, Lloyd considers a very wide range of philosophers from Plotinus up to Byzantine Neoplatonists ...
exaly +2 more sources
AbstractNeoplatonism is traditionally considered a mystical philosophy; on the contrary the aim of this book is to show the importance of a logical and epistemological approach for the understanding of Neoplatonic basic ontological problems. In doing that, Lloyd considers a very wide range of philosophers from Plotinus up to Byzantine Neoplatonists ...
exaly +2 more sources
2013
Neoplatonism (also called “Platonism”) refers to the school of philosophical and religious thought, beginning with the philosopher Plotinus (b. 204–d. 270 ce), which is marked by certain metaphysical teachings on Plato and Aristotle. After Plotinus, the three major periods of Neoplatonism include: the writings of Plotinus’s student, Porphyry (b. 232–d.
openaire +2 more sources
Neoplatonism (also called “Platonism”) refers to the school of philosophical and religious thought, beginning with the philosopher Plotinus (b. 204–d. 270 ce), which is marked by certain metaphysical teachings on Plato and Aristotle. After Plotinus, the three major periods of Neoplatonism include: the writings of Plotinus’s student, Porphyry (b. 232–d.
openaire +2 more sources
Proclus and the Neoplatonic Syllogistic
Journal of Philosophical Logic, 2001zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
openaire +2 more sources
Bulletin of Hispanic Studies, 1963
More than one reader must have felt some slight disappointment, on reading the Soledades of Gongora, at not finding more obvious traces of that philosophical content which Gongora explicitly claims for them in a letter written in 1613 or 1614 (Letter 2, Obras completas, ed. Mille y Gimenez, 1943, 796).
openaire +1 more source
More than one reader must have felt some slight disappointment, on reading the Soledades of Gongora, at not finding more obvious traces of that philosophical content which Gongora explicitly claims for them in a letter written in 1613 or 1614 (Letter 2, Obras completas, ed. Mille y Gimenez, 1943, 796).
openaire +1 more source