Results 101 to 110 of about 3,003 (162)

Classical Christology and Social Justice: Why the Divinity of Christ Matters [PDF]

, 2010
Hughson, Thomas
core   +1 more source

Origen on the Christological Significance of Psalm 45 (44) [PDF]

, 1997
Heine, Ronald E.
core   +1 more source

Dok. 25, Kyrill, ,Gegen Nestorius' [CV166]

openaire   +1 more source

Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Related searches:

L'épiscopat de Nestorius

Échos d'Orient, 1911
Jugie Martin. L'épiscopat de Nestorius. In: Échos d'Orient, tome 14, n°90, 1911. pp. 257-268.
M. Jugie
openaire   +3 more sources

CYRIL BEFORE NESTORIUS:

Claiming the Mantle of Cyril, 2021
openaire   +2 more sources

The Problem of Nestorius

Theology, 1924
L. Hodgson
openaire   +2 more sources

Aflame but not consumed: Nestorius and the person of Christ

Scottish Journal of Theology, 2020
Though Nestorius is often thought to have erred largely due to his christological views, this article will suggest that it was his hamartiology that led to his errant christological claims.
K. Sanders
semanticscholar   +1 more source

George A. Bevan, The New Judas. The Case of Nestorius in Ecclesiastical Politics, 428–451 CE. (Late Antique History and Religion, Vol. 13.) Leuven, Peeters 2016

Historische Zeitschrift, 2018
(S. 289–306) bietet eine vergleichende Analyse der zwei wichtigsten Heerführer, Aspar im Osten und Aëtius (samt anderen) im Westen, mit einem ähnlichen Schicksal: lange Karriere, danach ein tragisches Ende bei der Konfrontation mit dem regierenden Kaiser.
Volker L. Menze
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Modern Interpretations of Nestorius

Church History, 1963
Nestorius continues to be a problem for modern historians of doctrine. The Problem arose in the fifth century when the church acting at the Council of Ephesus (431 A.D.) anathematized Nestorius, the Bishop of Constantinople, and pronounced Nestorianism a christological heresy. The decisions of the Council of Ephesus were accepted and re-affirmed at the
openaire   +1 more source