Results 131 to 140 of about 1,420 (180)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
Neurolaw is an area of interdisciplinary research on the meaning and implications of neuroscience for the law and legal practices. This Element addresses the potential contributions of neuroscience, and the brain sciences more generally, to criminal justice decision-making and policy.
exaly +5 more sources
exaly +5 more sources
Neurorehabilitation and neurolaw
NeuroRehabilitation, 1996Neurological injuries result from a variety of traumatic events which may become the subject of civil litigation. The emerging field of medical jurisprudence known as neurolaw deals specifically with traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury in the legal setting.
openaire +3 more sources
Neurolaw and Direct Brain Interventions [PDF]
Criminal Law and Philosophy, 2012 This issue of Criminal Law and Philosophy contains three papers on a topic of increasing importance within the field of ‘‘neurolaw’’—namely, the implications for criminal law of direct brain intervention based mind altering techniques (DBI’s). To locate these papers’ topic within a broader context, I begin with an overview of some prominent topics in ...
Nicole A Vincent
exaly +4 more sources
Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 2010
Traumatic brain injury has received significant attention in recent years. Advances in diagnosis and management have resulted in opportunities to improve patient outcomes; however, controversies in diagnosis and management have resulted in increased interactions between the medical and legal communities.
Shana, De Caro, Michael V, Kaplen
openaire +2 more sources
Traumatic brain injury has received significant attention in recent years. Advances in diagnosis and management have resulted in opportunities to improve patient outcomes; however, controversies in diagnosis and management have resulted in increased interactions between the medical and legal communities.
Shana, De Caro, Michael V, Kaplen
openaire +2 more sources
Neurolaw: Challenges and limits
2023This chapter canvasses the current relevance of behavioral neuroscience to the law, especially to issues of criminal responsibility and competence. It begins with an explanation of the legal doctrines at stake. I then explore the source of the often-inflated claims for the legal relevance of neuroscience.
openaire +2 more sources
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 2018
Abstract:This short article proposes a conceptual structure for “neurolaw,” modeled loosely on the bipartite division of the sister field of neuroethics by Adina Roskies into the “ethics of neuroscience” and the “neuroscience of ethics.” As normative fields addressing the implications of scientific discoveries and expanding technological capacities ...
openaire +2 more sources
Abstract:This short article proposes a conceptual structure for “neurolaw,” modeled loosely on the bipartite division of the sister field of neuroethics by Adina Roskies into the “ethics of neuroscience” and the “neuroscience of ethics.” As normative fields addressing the implications of scientific discoveries and expanding technological capacities ...
openaire +2 more sources
The American Journal of Bioethics, 2008
With the emergence of neuroethics has come neurolaw. This neologism covers a growing list of legal domains in which neuroscience may prove relevant.
openaire +2 more sources
With the emergence of neuroethics has come neurolaw. This neologism covers a growing list of legal domains in which neuroscience may prove relevant.
openaire +2 more sources
Neurolaw: Towards a new medical jurisprudence
Brain Injury, 1995Traumatic brain injuries and spinal cord injuries occur in a variety of accidents which may become the subject of civil litigation. A new field of medical jurisprudence, called neurolaw, is emerging to join health-care professionals and attorneys in a common quest to employ legal remedies to enhance the quality of life for individuals with neurological
exaly +3 more sources
New Criminal Law Review, 2018
A sitting trial judge, and member of the MacArthur Foundation’s Research Network on Law and Neuroscience, makes short-term, long-term and “never happening” predictions about the impacts neuroscience will have on law.
openaire +1 more source
A sitting trial judge, and member of the MacArthur Foundation’s Research Network on Law and Neuroscience, makes short-term, long-term and “never happening” predictions about the impacts neuroscience will have on law.
openaire +1 more source