Results 231 to 240 of about 96,036 (260)

Knowledge Representation, Scientific Argumentation and Non-monotonic Logic

Models developed by the knowledge representation and reasoning community permit us to study defeasible inference based on argumentation and data. Scientific reasoning progresses by evaluating scientific hypotheses based on data and meta-evidence. Meta-evidence can be understood as arguments for discounting or even ignoring data or other meta-evidence ...
Landes, Jürgen, Corsi, Esther Anna, Baldi, Paolo   +2 more
openaire   +1 more source

Why Non-Monotonic Logic is Inadequate to Represent Balancing Arguments

Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2003
This paper analyses the logical structure of the balancing of conflicting normative arguments, and asks whether non-monotonic logic is adequate to represent this type of legal or practical reasoning. Norm conflicts are often regarded as a field of application for nonmonotonic logics. This paper argues, however, that the balancing of normative arguments
openaire   +1 more source

An Argumentation Framework for Non-monotonic Reasoning in Description Logic

2012
With the development of semantic web technology, ontology level reasoning among various agents has become an important topic. To handle the inconsistency between different knowledge bases, a non-monotonic reasoning method is always in need. However, for most approaches to non-monotonic ontology reasoning, new mechanism must be added into the reasoning ...
Geng Wang, Zuoquan Lin
openaire   +1 more source

“Should one not ask God for more?”: the non-monotonicity of constitutional argumentation

Sravnitel noe konstitucionnoe obozrenie, 2023
The decision-making process is often faced with uncertainty and a lack of necessary information. Therefore, decision makers sometimes have to limit their reasoning to the available data and replace unknown variables with certain assumptions. Accordingly, as new information becomes available, the findings can and should be revised. The premises on which
openaire   +1 more source

From non-monotonic syntax-based entailment to preference-based argumentation

1995
We briefly discuss and compare two frameworks for reasoning with inconsistent belief bases: argumentation systems, based on the construction and selection of acceptable arguments in favor of a conclusion, and syntax-based approaches to non-monotonic entailment, based on the selection of preferred consistent subbases.
openaire   +1 more source

Integrative oncology: Addressing the global challenges of cancer prevention and treatment

Ca-A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2022
Jun J Mao,, Msce, Lorenzo Cohen, Karen M Mustian   +2 more
exaly  

From Logic Programming and Non-monotonic Reasoning to Computational Argumentation and Beyond

2017
Argumentation has gained popularity in AI in recent years to support several activities and forms of reasoning. This talk will trace back the logic programming and non-monotonic reasoning origins of two well-known argumentation formalisms in AI (namely abstract argumentation and assumption-based argumentation).
openaire   +1 more source

Obesity and adverse breast cancer risk and outcome: Mechanistic insights and strategies for intervention

Ca-A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2017
Cynthia Morata-Tarifa, Joyce M Slingerland   +1 more
exaly  

Multidisciplinary standards of care and recent progress in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Ca-A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2020
Aaron J Grossberg, William L Hwang, Anirban Maitra   +2 more
exaly  

Oral complications of cancer and cancer therapy

Ca-A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2012
Joel B Epstein, Rene-Jean Bensadoun, Andrei Barasch   +2 more
exaly