Results 161 to 170 of about 1,968,178 (204)
Background & aims: We evaluated the ability of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS 2002) and Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) to predict malnutrition related to poor clinical outcomes.
Maria Cristina Gonzalez +2 more
exaly +2 more sources
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
Is NRS-2002 a reliable tool in the nutritional assessment of cirrhosis: A comparative study
Acta Medica Mediterranea, 2021<p style="text-align:justify;font-size:9px;font-family:Times;"><b><i>Introduction</i></b><i>: Nutritional assessment of cirrhotic patients is a neglected issue. This study compared cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic subjects in terms of nutritional assessment tools and investigated the relationship between ...
openaire +1 more source
Nutrition Risk Screening in Intensive Care Units: Agreement Between NUTRIC and NRS 2002 Tools
Nutrition in Clinical Practice, 2019AbstractBackgroundThe American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition recommends nutrition screening in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and indicates the use of 2 tools: Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS 2002) or Nutrition Risk in the Critically Ill (NUTRIC). This study aims to compare nutrition risk detected by NRS 2002 and
Mariane Kubiszewski Coruja +3 more
openaire +2 more sources
Clinical Nutrition, 2003
A system for screening of nutritional risk is described. It is based on the concept that nutritional support is indicated in patients who are severely ill with increased nutritional requirements, or who are severely undernourished, or who have certain degrees of severity of disease in combination with certain degrees of undernutrition.
Kondrup, Jens +3 more
openaire +3 more sources
A system for screening of nutritional risk is described. It is based on the concept that nutritional support is indicated in patients who are severely ill with increased nutritional requirements, or who are severely undernourished, or who have certain degrees of severity of disease in combination with certain degrees of undernutrition.
Kondrup, Jens +3 more
openaire +3 more sources
Nutrition and Cancer, 2017
To investigate nutritional markers that better predict nutritional risk according to the Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS-2002), to verify agreement between indicators, and to identify the calf circumference cut-off point for diagnosing nutritional risk.Cross-sectional study with older patients hospitalized for neoplasms.
Vania Aparecida, Leandro-Merhi +2 more
openaire +2 more sources
To investigate nutritional markers that better predict nutritional risk according to the Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS-2002), to verify agreement between indicators, and to identify the calf circumference cut-off point for diagnosing nutritional risk.Cross-sectional study with older patients hospitalized for neoplasms.
Vania Aparecida, Leandro-Merhi +2 more
openaire +2 more sources
Predictive value of glim compared to NRS-2002 on COVID 19 outcomes
Clinical Nutrition ESPEN, 2023G.M. Fotsing +5 more
openaire +1 more source
Importance of NRS 2002 in surgical patients in our center
Clinical Nutrition, 2018C. Palomares Avilés +9 more
openaire +1 more source

