Results 21 to 30 of about 241 (139)
Los obiter dictum como discursos del poder. Estudio a partir del caso Fernández de Kirchner
La actividad judicial, diseñada constitucionalmente como un mero control técnico, se ha modificado gradualmente por el control de constitucionalidad, la judicialización de la política y el activismo judicial, aspectos bien estudiados por los necesarios equilibrios de los poderes públicos.
Ricardo Sebastian Piana +1 more
openaire +1 more source
The future of dispute resolution in international trade
Abstract Given ongoing dysfunction of the World Trade Organization's Appellate Body, the focus of this article is on the future of trade dispute resolution, with evaluation of two questions: (i) What is the current status of WTO dispute resolution as compared to that conducted through existing preferential trade agreements (PTAs)? and (ii) What are the
Ian Sheldon, Daniel C. K. Chow
wiley +1 more source
CONCEITOS FUNDAMENTAIS DO SISTEMA DE PRECEDENTES E FUNDAMENTAÇÃO DAS DECISÕES JUDICIAIS
a compreensão do sistema de precedentes exige que o estudioso conheça alguns conceitos fundamentais. As noções de ratio decidendi e obiter dictum são fundamentais. Da mesma forma, conhecer o caráter evolutivo dos conceitos de precedente, jurisprudência e
Murilo Teixeira Avelino
doaj
The Defence of Public Necessity
This article challenges the idea that public necessity must be a complete defence to trespass liability. It identifies and distinguishes three distinct categories of public necessity: two afford justifications for interfering with person or property, whereas the third is better understood as an excuse.
Samuel Beswick
wiley +1 more source
A Tale of Too Many Doctrines: Supervening Impossibility and the Sale of Goods
Contracts for the sale of goods contain three default rules addressing the problem of supervening impossibility: sections 7 and 20 of the Sale of Goods Act 1979 and the doctrine of frustration. This article uses a legal historical method to examine why this is the case and what the relationship between these rules is.
Chathuni Jayathilaka
wiley +1 more source
Financing a restructuring in the Netherlands after IHC v. Rabobank
This case-note examines the Dutch Supreme Court’s ('Hoge Raad') landmark decision in IHC v. Rabobank, its second ruling to date on the interpretation the Act on Court Confirmation of Extrajudicial Restructuring Plans (WHOA).
Frank Verstijlen
doaj +1 more source
Abstract In 2021, the Hague District Court ruled in favour of several non‐governmental organisations in a climate lawsuit against Royal Dutch Shell Plc. It obliged Shell to reduce its CO2 emissions resulting from its global operations by 45%, relative to 2019 levels, by 2030.
Bengt Johannsen +2 more
wiley +1 more source
The Scope of the Medical Exception in Criminal Law
Many medical procedures involve the causation of serious injury by doctors to their patients. Yet when accepted as ‘proper medical treatment’, doctors incur no criminal liability for their actions, per the ‘medical exception’ in criminal law. This exception is well established; its scope much less so.
Lisa Forsberg
wiley +1 more source
Sovereignty and the Persistence of the Aesthetic
British constitutional thought tends to understand sovereignty in legalistic terms, with the concept often equated with the doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty. As Loughlin and Tierney have recently argued, this approach obscures the political considerations which undergird the legal precept. In this article we argue that this approach misses a third,
Illan Wall, Daniel Matthews
wiley +1 more source
The Energy Charter Treaty: Letting the sun set on sunset clauses
Abstract This article focuses on the sunset clause of the Energy Charter Treaty (ECT). The ECT is a multilateral investor‐state arbitration treaty which allows for the use of investor‐state dispute settlement (ISDS) tribunals to arbitrate challenges arising from shifts in energy policy that lead to a loss in profits for relevant energy companies.
Eoin Jackson
wiley +1 more source

