Results 181 to 190 of about 4,089 (236)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Related searches:

HABITUATION TO OCCLUSIVE DRESSINGS

Lancet, The, 1973
Abstract Eleven patients became habituated to occlusive bandages which had been applied many years before as therapy for either gravitational ulcers or eczema of the legs. Although the skin in all patients had returned to normal, it was impossible to persuade these patients to abandon their initial therapy.
J A Cotterill
exaly   +3 more sources

Occlusive Dressings

The Journal of Dermatologic Surgery and Oncology, 1993
background. Although occlusive dressings speed epithelization, reduce inflammation and tenderness, reduce the chance of infection, stimulate healing of chronic wounds, and produce less scarring, they are still underutilized by physicians and nurses. The principal reasons for their underutilization are fear of infection, the time needed for instructing
William H Eaglstein
exaly   +3 more sources

Wound infection under occlusive dressings

Journal of Hospital Infection, 1991
It is often supposed that occlusive dressings potentiate wound infection. However, even though heavy colonization by skin and wound flora is often seen under certain types of occlusion, clinical infection is not a frequent occurrence. Commensal wound flora consists of a variety of Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms and fungi which do not appear ...
J C Lawrence, J C Lawrence
exaly   +3 more sources

Occlusive Dressings

open access: yesArchives of Surgery, 1990
We studied the effect of different occlusive dressings and of air exposure on the growth of four pathogenic bacteria in wounds. Partial-thickness wounds on domestic pigs were inoculated with Staphylococcus aureus, Clostridium perfringens, Bacteroides fragilis, or Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
D A, Marshall   +2 more
openaire   +3 more sources

Occlusive dressings: A microbiologic and clinical review

American Journal of Infection Control, 1990
This review discusses the microbiology of normal skin and wounds and examines the rates of infection reported under both conventional (nonocclusive) dressings and all occlusive dressings, together with cost factors. The overall infection rate under conventional dressings was 7.1% in 1085 wounds, whereas under occlusive dressings on 3047 wounds the rate
Maryanne Mcguckin
exaly   +3 more sources

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy