Results 71 to 80 of about 655 (84)

Modal Panentheism [PDF]

open access: yes, 2016
Nagasawa, Yujin
core  
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Related searches:

The Omnibenevolence Paradox and the Education Paradox: An Amendment to G. W. Leibniz’s Theodicy

2021
The paper is devoted to the problem of creativity and its main ethical aspects: the Omnibenevolence Paradox and the Education Paradox. The first relates to the idea of God the Creator, who wishes only good, but permits a great deal of evil. The second relates to the first and is that any spiritual culture which educates for the inculcation of certain ...
Anton Zamorev, Alexander Fedyukovsky
openaire   +1 more source

Omnibenevolence and Evil

Ethics, 1986
What if the evils of the world were defeated by a certain state of affairs q such that q is good and such that any possible state of affairs entailing q is better than any possible state of affairs not entailing q? . . . What possible state of affairs could thus serve to defeat the evil that is in the world?
openaire   +1 more source

Omnibenevolence and Eternal Damnation

Sophia, 2005
In “Omnibenevolence and Eternal Damnation”, I consider whether it is consistent to hold both that God is omnibenevolent and that he infinitely punishes human beings for the commission of finite transgressions. In exploring this problem, I discuss the utilitarian and retributive notions of punishment and justice, the possible mitigating effect of ...
openaire   +1 more source

In what sense must God be omnibenevolent?

International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 1983
In response, other philosophers and theologians have argued that the concept of a 'best possible world' is meaningless since for every possible world God can create, there exists another actualizable world with a higher degree of perfection. They conclude, accordingly, that since God cannot be faulted for not creating that which cannot exist, the fact ...
openaire   +1 more source

Omnibenevolence, omnipotence, and God’s ability to do evil

Sophia, 1997
L'A. critique le raisonnement de Clarke et Geach au sujet de la bienveillance de Dieu et de son incapacite a faire le mal. Pour eux, la bienveillance de Dieu implique qu'il a necessairement fait ce qui etait le mieux. Pourtant, l'A. affirme qu'un etre qui agit avec bienveillance dans le sens moral, possede la capacite d'agir autrement.
openaire   +1 more source

Consequential Omnibenevolence

Grazer Philosophische Studien, 1994
openaire   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy