Results 181 to 190 of about 43,485 (258)
Digital AVATAR therapy for distressing voices in psychosis: the phase 2/3 AVATAR2 trial. [PDF]
Garety PA +19 more
europepmc +1 more source
Mentalizing Without a Mind: Psychotherapeutic Potential of Generative AI.
Yirmiya K, Fonagy P.
europepmc +1 more source
Enhancing Agency in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Therapies Through Sensorimotor Technologies.
Adrien V +9 more
europepmc +1 more source
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
Thought: A Journal of Philosophy, 2018
Beall and Cotnoir (2017) argue that theists may accept the claim that God’s omnipotence is fully unrestricted if they also adopt a suitable nonclassical logic. Their primary focus is on the infamous Stone problem (i.e., whether God can create a stone too heavy for God to lift). We show how unrestricted omnipotence generates Curry-like paradoxes.
Tedder, Andrew, Badia, Guillermo
openaire +3 more sources
Beall and Cotnoir (2017) argue that theists may accept the claim that God’s omnipotence is fully unrestricted if they also adopt a suitable nonclassical logic. Their primary focus is on the infamous Stone problem (i.e., whether God can create a stone too heavy for God to lift). We show how unrestricted omnipotence generates Curry-like paradoxes.
Tedder, Andrew, Badia, Guillermo
openaire +3 more sources
European Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 2022
In “God of the Gaps: A Neglected Reply to God’s Stone Problem”, Jc Beall and A. J. Cotnoir offer a gappy solution to the paradox of (unrestricted) omnipotence that is typified by the classic stone problem. Andrew Tedder and Guillermo Badia, however, have
J. J. Joaquin
semanticscholar +1 more source
In “God of the Gaps: A Neglected Reply to God’s Stone Problem”, Jc Beall and A. J. Cotnoir offer a gappy solution to the paradox of (unrestricted) omnipotence that is typified by the classic stone problem. Andrew Tedder and Guillermo Badia, however, have
J. J. Joaquin
semanticscholar +1 more source
2015
Traditional theism understands God to be the greatest being possible. According to the traditional conception, God possesses certain great-making properties or perfections, including necessary existence, omniscience, perfect goodness, and omnipotence.
Joshua Hoffman, Gary Rosenkrantz
openaire +2 more sources
Traditional theism understands God to be the greatest being possible. According to the traditional conception, God possesses certain great-making properties or perfections, including necessary existence, omniscience, perfect goodness, and omnipotence.
Joshua Hoffman, Gary Rosenkrantz
openaire +2 more sources
Aquinas on divine impeccability, omnipotence, and free will
Religious Studies: An International Journal for the Philosophy of Religion, 2018This article analyses Aquinas's conception of divine impeccability, and replies to some contemporary objections to this view. The first three sections show that for Aquinas the proposition that expresses God's impeccability is necessary de re, since God ...
Agustín Echavarría
semanticscholar +1 more source

