Results 211 to 220 of about 57,893 (261)

Large Language Model Chatbot Conversations vs Public Health Materials and Parental HPV Vaccination Intentions: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA Netw Open
Sehgal NKR, Rai S, Tonneau M, Agarwal AK, Cappella J, Kornides ML, Ungar L, Buttenheim A, Guntuku SC.   +8 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Related searches:

Ordinary language and ordinary belief

Philosophical Studies, 1954
be relevant. It is my understanding that these Oxford "philosophical analysts" (if Mr. Copi will pardon the phrase) do not believe that everything that people say-whether common men or philosophers-is correct. Their position is, according to Mr. Copi, "never explicitly formulated." Not only has it been explicitly formulated in a number of papers, had ...
exaly   +2 more sources

Ordinary Language and Economic Language

Recherches sémiotiques, 2023
We explore the language of economics from the perspective of the relation between signs, language and ideology. The focus is on social reproduction in global communication. From the epistemological viewpoint linguistics and economics are interrelated, both are sign sciences and value sciences.
Petrilli, Susan, Ponzio, Augusto
openaire   +2 more sources

Is There a World of Ordinary Language?

Philosophy Today, 1958
Having recently spent seven months on the continent of Europe and having conversed with philosophers in five different countries there, I was surprised to find, under wide diversities and sharp disagreements, a well-marked current moving in a single direction.
openaire   +1 more source

How Ordinary Is Ordinary Language?

New Literary History, 1973
IT HAS BEEN more than twenty years since Harold Whitehall declared that "no criticism can go beyond its linguistics."1 In that time linguistics itself has undergone a number of revolutions so that one of the terms in Whitehall's equation has been constantly changing.
openaire   +1 more source

Chomsky On The ‘Ordinary Language’ View Of Language

Synthese, 1999
There is a common-sense view of language, which is held by Wittgenstein, Strawson Dummett, Searle, Putnam, Lewis, Wiggins, and others. According to this view a language consists of conventions, it is rule-governed, rules are conventionalised, a language is learnt, there are general learning mechanisms in the brain, and so on. I shall call this view the
openaire   +1 more source

Austin and Ordinary Language

2002
exaly   +2 more sources

Unconfirmed Sightings Of An ‘Ordinary Language’ Theory Of Language

Synthese, 1999
It is unfortunate that Francis Y. Lin, in ‘Chomsky on the “ordinary language” view of language’ pays little attention to his own remark, ‘Chomsky’s criticisms make us realize that we should not be content with general and vague formulations of convention, ability, and so on.
openaire   +1 more source

Literary Language and Ordinary Language

2005
Does literature have a language of its own, perhaps rather unrepresentative of, or rather different from, ordinary language (e.g. old-fashioned, obscure, pretentious, generally ‘difficult’)? The simple answer to this old question is no, there is nothing uniquely different about the language of literature.
openaire   +1 more source