Results 171 to 180 of about 9,533 (224)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Related searches:

Distraction Osteogenesis

Facial Plastic Surgery Clinics of North America, 2014
James Sidman, MD, and Sherard A. Tatum, MD, address the following questions for discussion and debate. Is neonatal distraction osteogenesis (DO) better than lip-tongue adhesion or tracheotomy for micrognathic airway compromise? What role does DO have in adult orthognathic surgery situations?
James, Sidman, Sherard Austin, Tatum
  +5 more sources

Craniofacial Distraction Osteogenesis

Seminars in Plastic Surgery, 2023
AbstractDistraction osteogenesis (DO) of the craniofacial skeleton has become an effective technique for the treatment of both nonsyndromic and syndromic conditions. The advent of craniofacial DO has allowed for earlier intervention in pediatric patients with less complication risk and morbidity compared to traditional techniques.
Heather R, Burns   +3 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Distraction osteogenesis in craniosynostosis

Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head & Neck Surgery, 2021
Purpose of review Craniosynostosis, a condition of premature cranial suture fusion, can have significantly detrimental effects on development and growth due to sequelae of increased intracranial hypertension (ICP), exophthalmos, and upper airway obstruction. Evolving surgical treatments now include distraction osteogenesis (DO)
Henya, Sandhaus, Matthew D, Johnson
openaire   +2 more sources

Transsutural Distraction Osteogenesis Versus Osteotemy Distraction Osteogenesis

Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 2012
The technique of transsutural distraction osteogenesis (TSDO) rendered a new and minimally invasive alternative for midfacial advancement. Many topics addressed the osteotomy distraction of the midface; we know less, however, about the destiny of the advanced midface by transsutural distraction.Long-term results of 20 patients with midfacial hypoplasia
Chen, Liu   +4 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Maxillomandibular Distraction Osteogenesis

Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 2014
Distraction osteogenesis (DO) is a biologic process of new bone formation between the surfaces of bone segments that are gradually separated by incremental traction. It consists of 4 primary phases, namely, corticotomy and device placement, a latency period, active distraction, and consolidation. The objectives of the current study were to review DO as
Akinwale A, Efunkoya   +4 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Distraction osteogenesis--a review

British Dental Journal, 1998
This review describes the technique of distraction osteogenesis, outlining its application and current developments for the correction of craniofacial anomalies. Also described are some of the difficulties and complications which can arise with speculation on how this may be overcome.
J, Davies, S, Turner, J R, Sandy
openaire   +2 more sources

Distraction Osteogenesis of the Midface

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics of North America, 2005
Distraction osteogenesis has become an important part of pediatric oral and maxillofacial surgery. It is especially useful in the midface to overcome the perturbations of growth caused by congenital malformations, benign and malignant tumors, and traumatic injuries.
George K B, Sándor   +5 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Distraction Osteogenesis

Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 2006
The treatment of bone loss resulting from acute trauma has traditionally been a complex surgical problem. Numerous procedures have been devised to reconstitute bone stock, obtain fracture union, and provide a stable functional limb. Traditional internal bone transport has been used successfully for bony reconstruction for both acute and reconstructive ...
openaire   +2 more sources

Distraction Osteogenesis in the Hand

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1998
Distraction osteogenesis was used to correct congenital hand deformities in 12 digits. The patients' ages at the time of distraction ranged between 2.5 and 7 years. A total of nine patients underwent lengthening of 12 bones. The average period of distraction was 31.1 +/- 17.6 days. The average length of distraction was 23.6 +/- 7.3 mm.
J M, Pensler, N C, Carroll, L F, Cheng
openaire   +2 more sources

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy