Results 11 to 20 of about 74 (73)
"Rule-Following I: The Basic Issues". [PDF]
Abstract ‘Rule‐following’ is a name for a cluster of phenomena where we seem both guided and “normatively” constrained by something general in performing particular actions. Understanding the phenomenon is important because of its connection to meaning, representation, and content.
Reiland I.
europepmc +2 more sources
ABSTRACT Laws play some role in explanations: at the very least, they somehow connect what is explained, or the explanandum, to what explains, or the explanans. Thus, thermodynamical laws connect the match's being struck and its lightning, so that the former causes the latter; and laws about set formation connect Socrates' existence with {Socrates}'s ...
Julio De Rizzo
wiley +1 more source
Expected value, to a point: Moral decision‐making under background uncertainty
Abstract Expected value maximization gives plausible guidance for moral decision‐making under uncertainty in many situations. But it has unappetizing implications in ‘Pascalian’ situations involving tiny probabilities of extreme outcomes. This paper shows, first, that under realistic levels of ‘background uncertainty’ about sources of value independent
Christian Tarsney
wiley +1 more source
Sequences suffice for pointfree uniform completions
Abstract Completions of metric spaces are usually constructed using Cauchy sequences. However, this does not work for general uniform spaces, where Cauchy filters or nets must be used instead. The situation in pointfree topology is more straightforward: the correct completion of uniform locales can indeed be obtained as a quotient of a locale of Cauchy
Graham Manuell
wiley +1 more source
Weak compactness cardinals for strong logics and subtlety properties of the class of ordinals
Abstract Motivated by recent work of Boney, Dimopoulos, Gitman, and Magidor, we characterize the existence of weak compactness cardinals for all abstract logics through combinatorial properties of the class of ordinals. This analysis is then used to show that, in contrast to the existence of strong compactness cardinals, the existence of weak ...
Philipp Lücke
wiley +1 more source
Arithmetical pluralism and the objectivity of syntax
Abstract Arithmetical pluralism is the view that there is not one true arithmetic but rather many apparently conflicting arithmetical theories, each true in its own language. While pluralism has recently attracted considerable interest, it has also faced significant criticism.
Lavinia Picollo, Daniel Waxman
wiley +1 more source
Similarity accounts of counterfactuals: A reality check1
Abstract To an unusual extent, philosophers agree that counterfactuals have truth conditions involving the most similar possible worlds where their antecedents are true, in the style of the celebrated and path‐breaking Stalnaker/Lewis accounts. Roughly, these accounts say that the counterfactual if A were the case, C would be the case is true if and ...
Alan Hájek
wiley +1 more source
To infinity and beyond: A general framework for scaling economic theories
Many economic models incorporate finiteness assumptions that, while introduced for simplicity, play a real role in the analysis. We provide a principled framework for scaling results from such models by removing these finiteness assumptions. Our sufficient conditions are on the theorem statement only, and not on its proof. This results in short proofs,
Yannai A. Gonczarowski +2 more
wiley +1 more source
Infinite inference and mathematical conventionalism
Abstract We argue that (1) a purported example of an infinite inference we humans can actually perform admits a faithful, finitary description, and (2) infinite inference contravenes any view which does not grant our minds uncomputable powers. These arguments block the strategy, dating back to Carnap's Logical Syntax of Language, of using infinitary ...
Douglas Blue
wiley +1 more source
Abstract The mature Wittgenstein's groundbreaking analyses of sense and the logical must—and the powerful new method that made them possible—were the result of a multi‐year process of writing, re‐arranging, re‐writing and one large‐scale revision that eventually produced the Philosophical Investigations and RFM I.
Penelope Maddy
wiley +1 more source

