Results 51 to 60 of about 855 (200)
Seismic Vulnerability of Non-Code-Compliant and Code-Compliant RC Buildings
This study investigates the seismic vulnerability of non-code-compliant reinforced concrete (RC) buildings compared to code-based structures. The research uses linear elastic and nonlinear pushover analyses (NPA) to evaluate critical seismic performance ...
Birendra K. Bohara +2 more
doaj +1 more source
ABSTRACT Housing shortages in the United States and the pursuit of sustainable and resilient communities have positioned cross‐laminated timber (CLT) housing as a promising alternative due to the ability to design for modularity, ease of construction, and low embodied carbon performance.
Javier A. Chininin +2 more
wiley +1 more source
Risk‐Targeted Seismic Design Maps for Mexico
ABSTRACT Risk‐targeted seismic design maps for Mexico are presented. Risk‐targeted approach establishes an acceptable risk level, measured with the annual collapse probability, to determine seismic design coefficients. Seismic design maps are calculated for an annual probability of collapse of 1 × 10−4 and 2 × 10−4.
Raúl Sandoval, Mario Ordaz
wiley +1 more source
Overstrength Factors of Buckling Restrained Braced Frames [PDF]
In this study the overstrength factors of medium to low-rise bucking restrained braced frames (BRBF) were evaluated. Various design variables, such as number of stories, span length, yield strength of the brace, level of earthquake load, and the response modification factors.
openaire +1 more source
Earthquakes have caused, and will continue to cause, damage to the built environment, resulting in casualties, economic losses, and long‐term societal impacts. One approach to decreasing future losses is limiting the damage that buildings experience during an earthquake and speeding up their recovery by following the “build back better” principle.
Nikola Blagojević +7 more
wiley +1 more source
In seismic codes, the force strength reduction factor is proposed to transform elastic to inelastic strength. The ductility reduction factor, Rμ, plays a key role on R factor if no overstrength is present. The Rμ is determined by SDOF systems.
Mohsen Gerami +2 more
doaj +1 more source
Limiting Safety‐Critical Structural Damage in Recovery‐Based Seismic Design Provisions
In the move toward design practices that facilitate recovery, there are ongoing efforts to reevaluate structural seismic design parameters such as design drift limits and response modification coefficients. To support the development of the 2026 NEHRP functional recovery design provisions, we propose design modifications that limit the occurrence of ...
Kristen Blowes +5 more
wiley +1 more source
Nonstructural Design Requirements for Functional Recovery Performance
Work is underway in the United States to develop the first generation of prescriptive seismic design provisions for functional recovery. The Building Seismic Safety Council (BSSC) has proposed targeting a 25% probability of exceeding 0 days for functional recovery category (FRC) A, 3 days for FRC B, 2 months for FRC C, and 6 months for FRC D at the ...
Kristen Blowes +5 more
wiley +1 more source
Mechanical Properties and Influence Factors of Ordinary Shear Links
The current specification requires the same limiting values of inelastic rotation and the overstrength factor for shear links with a length ratio less than 1.6.
Shujun Hu +3 more
doaj +1 more source
Performance-based seismic codes ensure proper inelastic behaviour of reinforced concrete frames through capacity design, among others. This strategy relies not only on avoiding brittle failures and providing ductility to plastic hinges but also in their ...
Fernando Gómez-Martínez +1 more
doaj +1 more source

