Results 291 to 300 of about 20,085 (321)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
2007 IEEE Conference on Emerging Technologies & Factory Automation (EFTA 2007), 2007
There are numerous methods to achieve Web service composition, ranging from semi-automatic to on-the-fly automated processes. This paper proposes an approach to semantic Web service composition based on an AI-planning-like algorithm, which proceeds in a depth-first state-space search manner.
B. D. Tran, P. S. Tan, A. Goh
openaire +1 more source
There are numerous methods to achieve Web service composition, ranging from semi-automatic to on-the-fly automated processes. This paper proposes an approach to semantic Web service composition based on an AI-planning-like algorithm, which proceeds in a depth-first state-space search manner.
B. D. Tran, P. S. Tan, A. Goh
openaire +1 more source
OWL-S Process Model Matchmaking
2010 IEEE International Conference on Web Services, 2010In this paper, we propose an approach for approximate matching of OWL-S process model. We also propose a similarity measure that captures structural and semantic differences between two process models. To do so, we reduce the process matching to a graph matching problem and we adapt existing algorithms for this purpose.
Ahmed Gater +2 more
openaire +1 more source
2006 IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS'06), 2006
WSDL-S and OWL-S are semantic Web services languages that both aim at enriching WSDL with semantic annotation. In this paper, we analyze the similarities and differences between the two languages aiming at showing how OWL-S annotations could take advantage of WSDL-S annotations.
Massimo Paolucci, Matthias Wagner
openaire +1 more source
WSDL-S and OWL-S are semantic Web services languages that both aim at enriching WSDL with semantic annotation. In this paper, we analyze the similarities and differences between the two languages aiming at showing how OWL-S annotations could take advantage of WSDL-S annotations.
Massimo Paolucci, Matthias Wagner
openaire +1 more source
Converting WSMO to OWL-S system
2009 IEEE Asia-Pacific Services Computing Conference (APSCC), 2009Semantic Web services have been employed in a wide range of applications and have become a key technology in developing business operations on the Web. However, heterogeneity is a major problem of the current semantic Web service technologies. In particular, semantic Web services described by different description languages cannot work together.
Duy-Ngan Le +2 more
openaire +1 more source
Foundations for specifying OWL-S groundings
International Journal of Business Process Integration and Management, 2007OWL-Sis an ontology in theWeb Ontology Language (OWL) that is used to describe and specify semantic web services. While OWL-S provides a promising mechanism for specification, publication, discovery, integration and access, the learning curve can be steep.
Gerald C. Gannod +2 more
openaire +1 more source
Verifying OWL-S Service Process Models
2011 IEEE International Conference on Web Services, 2011OWL-S is an ontology that provides the necessary vocabulary for describing various components of Web services so that automated discovery, composition and invocation of Web services can be made possible. The main component, the process model, describes the interaction protocol between a Web service and its clients.
Yuzhang Feng, Markus Kirchberg
openaire +1 more source
2011
WSMO is just one of the frameworks to semantically describe Web services that have been developed in the last years. OWL-S and its extension SWSF, as well as METEOR-S, have proposed alternative approaches to WSMO that, despite sharing some similarities, exhibit significant differences with respect to the technological standards, languages and ...
Dieter Fensel +3 more
openaire +1 more source
WSMO is just one of the frameworks to semantically describe Web services that have been developed in the last years. OWL-S and its extension SWSF, as well as METEOR-S, have proposed alternative approaches to WSMO that, despite sharing some similarities, exhibit significant differences with respect to the technological standards, languages and ...
Dieter Fensel +3 more
openaire +1 more source
From OWL-S Descriptions to Petri Nets
2009While OWL-S advertisements provide a rich (ontological and behavioural) description of Web services, there are no tools that support formal analyses of OWL-S services. In this paper we present a translator from OWL-S descriptions to Petri nets which makes such analyses possible thanks to the many tools available for Petri nets.
BROGI, ANTONIO, S. Corfini, S. Iardella
openaire +2 more sources
Hierarchical Composition of OWL-S Web Services
2008 Sixth International Conference on Software Engineering Research, Management and Applications, 2008Due to constant changes of business requirements and applications, dynamical reconfiguration of service composition becomes an important and challenging task. Web service composition may save time and expense in software development. In this paper, we introduce the abstract service hierarchy in the OWL-S Ontology Framework for dynamic web service ...
Jing Dong, Yongtao Sun, Yajing Zhao
openaire +1 more source
Matching WSDL and OWL-S Web Services
2009 IEEE International Conference on Semantic Computing, 2009Web services discovery systems have been developed to search for a suitable Web service from a typically large number of advertised Web services. However, current discovery systems support either WSDL or OWL-S Web services but not both. This is a significant limitation since a requested WSDL Web service can be matched against an advertised OWL-S Web ...
Duy-Ngan Le, Van-Quoc Nguyen, Angela Goh
openaire +1 more source