Results 21 to 30 of about 576 (111)
Dialectical Multivalued Logic and Probabilistic Theory
There are two probabilistic algebras: one for classical probability and the other for quantum mechanics. Naturally, it is the relation to the object that decides, as in the case of logic, which algebra is to be used.
José Luis Usó Doménech +2 more
doaj +1 more source
Aristotle’s Theory of Deduction and Paraconsistency
No Órganon Aristóteles descreve alguns esquemas dedutivos nos quais a presença de inconsistências não acarreta a trivialização da teoria lógica envolvida.
Evandro L. Gomes +1 more
doaj +3 more sources
A Brief Prehistory of Philosophical Paraconsistency
In celebration of Newton da Costa’s place in the history of paraconsistency, this paper considers the use and abuse of deliberate self-contradiction.
William H. F. Altman
doaj +3 more sources
Rational Inconsistency and Reasoning
Nicholas Rescher has argued we must tolerate inconsistency because of our cognitive limitations. He has also produced, together with R. Brandom, a serious attempt at exploring the logic of inconsistency.
Bryson Brown
doaj +1 more source
Penalty Logic: Paraconsistency and Applications
Penalty logic is a non-classical non-monotonic logic which allows us to demonstrate the power of belief, the level of truth or the reliability of data that we are using. This logic can be useful to model human reasoning or to replace the penalty function
Varvara Iakovleva
semanticscholar +1 more source
This article describes an expert system that is designed and developed for a certain and limited application of human knowledge. Equipped with an information base, it is able to make decisions based on reasonable knowledge.
O. Porubay
semanticscholar +1 more source
Paraconsistent Logic and Its Place in Latin American Philosophy
This study presents an overview of paraconsistent logic, tracing its historical origins and development within what may be referred to as the Latin American school of paraconsistency.
Lauro de Matos Nunes Filho
doaj +1 more source
Inconsistency, Paraconsistency and ?-Inconsistency
In this paper I’ll explore the relation between ?-inconsistency and plain inconsistency, in the context of theories that intend to capture semantic concepts. In particular, I’ll focus on two very well known inconsistent but non-trivial theories of truth:
Bruno Da Ré
doaj +1 more source
Quasi-truth and defective knowledge in science: a critical examination
Quasi-truth (a.k.a. pragmatic truth or partial truth) is typically advanced as a framework accounting for incompleteness and uncertainty in the actual practices of science. Also, it is said to be useful for accommodating cases of inconsistency in science
JONAS R. BECKER ARENHART, DÉCIO KRAUSE
doaj +1 more source
Gerland’s „Dialectica” and Paraconsistency
The present state of paraconsistent logic attests to significant development, and its maturity permits a critical historical analysis of this advance, having in view the appreciation of its historical roots and stages of formation. The aim of our general
Itala M Loffredo D’Ottaviano +1 more
semanticscholar +1 more source

