Results 321 to 330 of about 179,036 (364)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

DR parsers: a generalization of LR parsers

Proceedings of the 1990 IEEE Workshop on Visual Languages, 2002
A method is presented to construct a parser for a visual language whose specification can be done by a context-free grammar. The main idea is to allow a traditional LR parser to choose the next symbol to parse from a two-dimensional space. The positional grammar is defined, and some examples are given.
Costagliola G., Chang S. K.
openaire   +3 more sources

Parsers in ML

Proceedings of the 1992 ACM conference on LISP and functional programming, 1992
We present the operational semantics of streams and stream matching as discussed in. Streams are data structures such as lists, but with different primitive operations. Streams not only provide an interface to usual imput/output channels, but may used as a data structure per se , holding any kind of element.
Michel Mauny, Daniel de Rauglaudre
openaire   +2 more sources

A Generalized Earley Parser for Human Activity Parsing and Prediction

IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2020
Detection, parsing, and future predictions on sequence data (e.g., videos) require the algorithms to capture non-Markovian and compositional properties of high-level semantics.
Siyuan Qi   +4 more
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Building a Semantic Parser Overnight

Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2015
How do we build a semantic parser in a new domain starting with zero training examples? We introduce a new methodology for this setting: First, we use a simple grammar to generate logical forms paired with canonical utterances.
Yushi Wang, Jonathan Berant, Percy Liang
semanticscholar   +1 more source

The DINOUS parser

Natural Language Engineering, 1998
This paper deals with the development of parsing techniques for the analysis of natural language sentences. We present a paradigm of a multi- path shift-reduce parser which combines two differently structured computational subsystems. The first uses information concerning native speakers' preferences, and the second deals with the linguistic ...
Anthony Draggiotis   +2 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Total parser combinators [PDF]

open access: possibleACM SIGPLAN Notices, 2010
A monadic parser combinator library which guarantees termination of parsing, while still allowing many forms of left recursion, is described. The library's interface is similar to those of many other parser combinator libraries, with two important differences: one is that the interface clearly specifies which parts of the constructed parsers may be ...
openaire   +1 more source

Multibox parsers: no more handwritten lexical parsers

IEEE Software, 1995
Most parser generators do not work with lexically complex languages like Fortran. Compiler writers end up writing lexers by hand. To deal with this complexity, the author suggests generating a parser that uses a series of boxes-like a mechanical caterpillar-instead of just two. >
openaire   +2 more sources

An ideational parser

ACM SIGLASH Newsletter, 1979
Recent parsers have extended the variety and difficulty of natural language constructs recognizable by a computer. However, one shortcoming of existing parsers is that as the complexity of the sentences recognized increases, the computational complexity increases quadratically. One reason for this computational explosion is that much if not most of the
Jeffrey F. Eastman, Alan L. Tharp
openaire   +2 more sources

Mison: A Fast JSON Parser for Data Analytics

Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 2017
The growing popularity of the JSON format has fueled increased interest in loading and processing JSON data within analytical data processing systems. However, in many applications, JSON parsing dominates performance and cost. In this paper, we present a
Yinan Li   +4 more
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Multibox parsers

ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 1994
Traditional compiler front end generating tools such as Lex/Yacc assume a front end consisting of two boxes: a lexical box and a syntax box. Lex produces a lexical analyzer using regular expressions as a token description. Yacc generates a syntax analyzer from the LALR grammar for the parsed language.
openaire   +3 more sources

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy