Results 161 to 170 of about 5,525 (221)
Processing effects of L1/L2 from L3 in translation recognition paradigm: an exploratory ERP study. [PDF]
Front PsycholZhaksylykkyzy K +4 more
europepmc +1 more source
A geometric semantic model and Parts-of-Sense Inference annotation framework. [PDF]
Front Artif IntellPala K +3 more
europepmc +1 more source
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
2000
Abstract Present. The present participle is formed by adding -en to the stem, original or extended; gelen ‘coming’; olan ‘being, becoming’; indirilen ‘being brought down’; dağlŞan ‘dispersing’. The usual y is inserted after vowel-stems and narrows the preceding vowel, although this narrowing is not always shown in writing: anla‘to ...
openaire +1 more source
Abstract Present. The present participle is formed by adding -en to the stem, original or extended; gelen ‘coming’; olan ‘being, becoming’; indirilen ‘being brought down’; dağlŞan ‘dispersing’. The usual y is inserted after vowel-stems and narrows the preceding vowel, although this narrowing is not always shown in writing: anla‘to ...
openaire +1 more source
1995
Abstract The Active Eventive Participles In -nt-. In PIE this participle was formed from the STEM, by means of the suffix *-ont-/*-11t-. That is, in contrast to such verbals as the infin. and verbals in * -to-- and * -no--, which were originally built directly to the root, there might be a distinct pple. in -nt- to every pres./imperf.
openaire +1 more source
Abstract The Active Eventive Participles In -nt-. In PIE this participle was formed from the STEM, by means of the suffix *-ont-/*-11t-. That is, in contrast to such verbals as the infin. and verbals in * -to-- and * -no--, which were originally built directly to the root, there might be a distinct pple. in -nt- to every pres./imperf.
openaire +1 more source
The morphologization of German noun-participle combinations. A diachronic case study
Morphology, 2023Carlotta J Hübener
exaly