Results 331 to 340 of about 14,199,958 (398)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 1989
The patch test is a necessary tool to evaluate contact dermatitis and other pruritic dermatoses. To obtain accurate test results, however, high-quality test material must be used, the application technique must be correct, and the results must be evaluated with skill and criticism.
Irma Kihlman, Torkel Fischer
openaire +3 more sources
The patch test is a necessary tool to evaluate contact dermatitis and other pruritic dermatoses. To obtain accurate test results, however, high-quality test material must be used, the application technique must be correct, and the results must be evaluated with skill and criticism.
Irma Kihlman, Torkel Fischer
openaire +3 more sources
American Journal of Contact Dermatitis, 2000
Patch testing is an invaluable diagnostic tool in the evaluation of allergic contact dermatitis. While TrueTest has simplified the technique for many practitioners, there remains potential for error. We asked 4 experts to describe their approach to several dilemmas encountered in patch testing.
Anita Licata +3 more
openaire +3 more sources
Patch testing is an invaluable diagnostic tool in the evaluation of allergic contact dermatitis. While TrueTest has simplified the technique for many practitioners, there remains potential for error. We asked 4 experts to describe their approach to several dilemmas encountered in patch testing.
Anita Licata +3 more
openaire +3 more sources
JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 1967
Patch testing consists of the application of substances to the skin for the purpose of detecting specific hypersensitivity. It serves as an admirable diagnostic tool in the clinical study of patients who have inflammatory dermatitic reactions of an allergic nature.
openaire +3 more sources
Patch testing consists of the application of substances to the skin for the purpose of detecting specific hypersensitivity. It serves as an admirable diagnostic tool in the clinical study of patients who have inflammatory dermatitic reactions of an allergic nature.
openaire +3 more sources
Prognostic patch testing: The other kind of patch test
American Journal of Contact Dermatitis, 1998Prognostic patch testing differs from diagnostic patch testing. Clinicians routinely perform diagnostic patch testing, but prognotic patch testing is the province of corporate research and development departments and, in the United States, contract laboratories.
openaire +4 more sources
Contact Dermatitis, 1978
SCOPUS: ar.j ; FLWNA ; info:eu-repo/semantics ...
Oleffe, Jacques +2 more
openaire +3 more sources
SCOPUS: ar.j ; FLWNA ; info:eu-repo/semantics ...
Oleffe, Jacques +2 more
openaire +3 more sources
Contact Dermatitis, 1996
92 children (45 girls, 47 boys), mean age 9.3 years (3‐14.75), were referred to the Contact Dermatitis Investigation Unit, Belvidere Hospital, Glasgow, for patch testing during the period 1979–93 for the investigation of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). The diagnoses at the time of referral were atopic dermatitis (45).
A. Forsyth, R. S. Lever, G. I. Stables
openaire +3 more sources
92 children (45 girls, 47 boys), mean age 9.3 years (3‐14.75), were referred to the Contact Dermatitis Investigation Unit, Belvidere Hospital, Glasgow, for patch testing during the period 1979–93 for the investigation of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). The diagnoses at the time of referral were atopic dermatitis (45).
A. Forsyth, R. S. Lever, G. I. Stables
openaire +3 more sources
Dermatitis, 2013
Adverse drug reactions occur commonly and primarily manifest in a myriad of cutaneous eruptions. The use of drug patch testing in the diagnosis of specific drug eruptions is increasing; however, a standardized approach to this methodology is currently lacking.
Luz Fonacier +2 more
openaire +2 more sources
Adverse drug reactions occur commonly and primarily manifest in a myriad of cutaneous eruptions. The use of drug patch testing in the diagnosis of specific drug eruptions is increasing; however, a standardized approach to this methodology is currently lacking.
Luz Fonacier +2 more
openaire +2 more sources
Patch testing with methyldibromoglutaronitrile
American Journal of Contact Dermatitis, 2000The combination of methyldibromoglutaronitrile (MDBGN) and phenoxyethanol (PE) is widely used as a preservative in body care products. Sensitization rates to MDBGN have increased parallel to its increasing use in cosmetics, skin care products, and moist toilet paper since the early 1990s, whereas PE is obviously not a sensitizer.
J, Geier +3 more
openaire +3 more sources
Patch Testing Methodology [PDF]
, 2009 Jozef Jadassohn is the father of patch testing. At the time of his discovery in 1895, he was Professor of Dermatology at Breslau University (now Wroclaw in Poland). He initially reported a patient who had developed an eczematous reaction to mercury plasters.
Howard I. Maibach, Jean-Marie Lachapelle
openaire +1 more source
Contact Dermatitis, 1984
Colophony (rosin) has been fractionated into 2 parts, an acidic and a neutral fraction. Routine patch testing with neutral components gives positive reactions at a 40% higher frequency than routine patch testing with colophony (20%) (w/w in pet.). A concentration of 60% colophony is suggested for routine patch testing.
B. Gruvberger, S. Fregert
openaire +3 more sources
Colophony (rosin) has been fractionated into 2 parts, an acidic and a neutral fraction. Routine patch testing with neutral components gives positive reactions at a 40% higher frequency than routine patch testing with colophony (20%) (w/w in pet.). A concentration of 60% colophony is suggested for routine patch testing.
B. Gruvberger, S. Fregert
openaire +3 more sources